Literature DB >> 12917942

Colony stimulating factors for chemotherapy induced febrile neutropenia.

O A C Clark1, G Lyman, A A Castro, L G O Clark, B Djulbegovic.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Febrile neutropenia is a frequent event for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy and it is potentially a life threatening situation. The current treatment is supportive care plus antibiotics. Colony stimulating factors (CSF) are cytokines that stimulate and accelerate the production of one or more cellular lines in bone marrow. Some clinical trials addressed the question of whether the addition of CSF to antibiotics (ATB) could improve the outcomes of patients with febrile neutropenia. The results of these trials are conflicting and no definitive conclusion could be reached.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of adding colony stimulating factors to ATB when treating febrile neutropenia caused by cancer chemotherapy. SEARCH STRATEGY: The search covered the major electronic databases: CANCERLIT, EMBASE, LILACS, MEDLINE, SCI and The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Experts were consulted and references from the relevant articles scanned. SELECTION CRITERIA: We looked for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare CSF plus antibiotics versus antibiotics alone for the treatment of established febrile neutropenia in adults and children. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two of the reviewers independently selected, critically appraised and extracted data from the studies. A meta-analysis of the select studies was performed, using Review Manager. MAIN
RESULTS: More than 8000 references were screened. Thirteen studies were included. The overall mortality was not influenced by the use of CSF [Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.68; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 0.43 to 1.08; p=0.1]. A marginally significant result was obtained for the use of CSF in reducing infection related mortality [OR= 0.51; 95% CI = 0.26 to 1.00; p=0.05], but this result was highly influenced by one study. When this study is excluded from our analysis, this possible benefit disappears [OR= 0.85; 95% CI = 0.33 to 2.20; p= 0.7]. The group of patients treated with CSF had a shorter length of hospitalization [Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.82; p=0.0006] and a shorter time to neutrophil recovery [HR= 0.32; 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.46; p < 0.00001]. REVIEWER'S
CONCLUSIONS: The use of CSF in patients with febrile neutropenia due to cancer chemotherapy does not affect overall mortality, but reduces the amount of time spent in hospital and the neutrophil recovery period. It was not clear whether CSF has an effect on infection-related mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12917942     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  13 in total

1.  Costs associated with febrile neutropenia in the US.

Authors:  Shannon L Michels; Rich L Barron; Matthew W Reynolds; Karen Smoyer Tomic; Jingbo Yu; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  [Hematopoietic growth factors. Possibilities and limitations].

Authors:  T K Held; M O Hildebrandt; W-D Ludwig
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 0.743

3.  Therapeutic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for established febrile neutropenia: effect on costs from a hospital perspective.

Authors:  Leon E Cosler; Adi Eldar-Lissai; Eva Culakova; Nicole M Kuderer; David Dale; Jeffrey Crawford; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Mortality, length of stay, and health care costs of febrile neutropenia-related hospitalizations among patients with breast cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Ranjan Pathak; Smith Giri; Madan Raj Aryal; Paras Karmacharya; Vijaya Raj Bhatt; Mike G Martin
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-01-04       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Colony-stimulating factors for chemotherapy-related febrile neutropenia are associated with improved prognosis in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Shi-Guang Ye; Y I Ding; Liang Li; Meng Yang; Wen-Jun Zhang; Ai-Bin Liang
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-06

Review 6.  Colony-stimulating factors for prevention and treatment of infectious complications in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  Ronit Gurion; Yulia Belnik-Plitman; Anat Gafter-Gvili; Mical Paul; Liat Vidal; Isaac Ben-Bassat; Ofer Shpilberg; Pia Raanani
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-06-13

Review 7.  Optimum management of pediatric patients with fever and neutropenia.

Authors:  Aditya H Gaur; Patricia M Flynn; Jerry L Shenep
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.967

8.  Spanish Society of Medical Oncology consensus for the use of haematopoietic colony-stimulating factors in cancer patients.

Authors:  Alfredo Carrato; Luis Paz-Ares Rodríguez; Alvaro Rodríguez Lescure; Ana M Casas Fernández de Tejerina; Eduardo Díaz Rubio García; Pedro Pérez Segura; Manuel Constenla Figueiras; Rocío García Carbonero; José Gómez Codina; Ana Lluch Hernández; José Pablo Maroto Rey; Miguel Martín Jiménez; José Ignacio Mayordomo Cámara; José Andrés Moreno Nogueira; Antonio Rueda Domínguez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 9.  Colony-stimulating factors for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia.

Authors:  Rahul Mhaskar; Otavio Augusto Camara Clark; Gary Lyman; Tobias Engel Ayer Botrel; Luciano Morganti Paladini; Benjamin Djulbegovic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-10-30

10.  Use of re-randomized data in meta-analysis.

Authors:  Iztok Hozo; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Otavio Clark; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.