Michael C Munin1, Clark A Rosen, Thomas Zullo. 1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. Muninmc@msx.upmc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the value of laryngeal electromyography in predicting recovery after vocal fold paralysis and to determine what elements of laryngeal electromyography are most predictive of outcome. DESIGN: Cohort study with retrospective data review. SETTING: University voice center. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive sample of 31 patients with vocal fold paralysis diagnosed by indirect laryngoscopy, using either nasal insertion with a flexible nasopharyngoscope or peroral with a 70 degrees Hopkins rod. Inclusion criteria were that laryngeal electromyography had to have been performed between 21 days and 6 months from the onset of symptoms and patients must have been followed a minimum of 6 months. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Vocal fold motion at 6 months from onset of symptoms. RESULTS: Nine subjects (29%) had resolved vocal fold motion, whereas 22 (71%) had persistent vocal fold paralysis. By using our laryngeal electromyography paradigm, 4 of 6 patients with a laryngeal electromyography prognosis of excellent resolved. The predictive value for a negative test was 66.7%. For patients with a fair or poor prognosis, 5 of 25 resolved. The predictive value for a positive test was 80%. Only 8 of 22 patients with persistent vocal fold paralysis had fibrillations, and spontaneous activity was not significantly related to outcome. Patients with absent or greatly decreased motor unit recruitment had a significantly higher proportion of permanent vocal fold paralysis (P<.05). Stepwise forward logistic regression determined that prognosis by laryngeal electromyography and onset time were significant predictors of outcome (P<.01). The model predicted 44.4% of resolved cases, which represents a moderate prediction. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the utility of laryngeal electromyography in assessing prognosis for recovery of vocal fold motion after laryngeal nerve injury. The results support our hypothesis that preset decision rules based on laryngeal electromyography data can be effectively used to determine a prognosis for recovery of vocal fold motion.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the value of laryngeal electromyography in predicting recovery after vocal fold paralysis and to determine what elements of laryngeal electromyography are most predictive of outcome. DESIGN: Cohort study with retrospective data review. SETTING: University voice center. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive sample of 31 patients with vocal fold paralysis diagnosed by indirect laryngoscopy, using either nasal insertion with a flexible nasopharyngoscope or peroral with a 70 degrees Hopkins rod. Inclusion criteria were that laryngeal electromyography had to have been performed between 21 days and 6 months from the onset of symptoms and patients must have been followed a minimum of 6 months. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Vocal fold motion at 6 months from onset of symptoms. RESULTS: Nine subjects (29%) had resolved vocal fold motion, whereas 22 (71%) had persistent vocal fold paralysis. By using our laryngeal electromyography paradigm, 4 of 6 patients with a laryngeal electromyography prognosis of excellent resolved. The predictive value for a negative test was 66.7%. For patients with a fair or poor prognosis, 5 of 25 resolved. The predictive value for a positive test was 80%. Only 8 of 22 patients with persistent vocal fold paralysis had fibrillations, and spontaneous activity was not significantly related to outcome. Patients with absent or greatly decreased motor unit recruitment had a significantly higher proportion of permanent vocal fold paralysis (P<.05). Stepwise forward logistic regression determined that prognosis by laryngeal electromyography and onset time were significant predictors of outcome (P<.01). The model predicted 44.4% of resolved cases, which represents a moderate prediction. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the utility of laryngeal electromyography in assessing prognosis for recovery of vocal fold motion after laryngeal nerve injury. The results support our hypothesis that preset decision rules based on laryngeal electromyography data can be effectively used to determine a prognosis for recovery of vocal fold motion.
Authors: Leah B Helou; J Richard Jennings; Clark A Rosen; Wei Wang; Katherine Verdolini Abbott Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2020-09-03 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: Peiyun Zhuang; Steven Nemcek; Ketan Surender; Matthew R Hoffman; Fan Zhang; William J Chapin; Jack J Jiang Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2013-05-29 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Andrew Blitzer; Roger L Crumley; Seth H Dailey; Charles N Ford; Mary Kay Floeter; Allen D Hillel; Henry T Hoffmann; Christy L Ludlow; Albert Merati; Michael C Munin; Lawrence R Robinson; Clark Rosen; Keith G Saxon; Lucian Sulica; Susan L Thibeault; Ingo Titze; Peak Woo; Gayle E Woodson Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2009-04-09 Impact factor: 3.497