Literature DB >> 12917392

OMP gene deletion results in an alteration in odorant-induced mucosal activity patterns.

S L Youngentob1, P F Kent, F L Margolis.   

Abstract

Previous behavioral work, using a complex five-odorant identification task, demonstrated that olfactory marker protein (OMP) is critically involved in odor processing to the extent that its loss results in an alteration in odorant quality perception. Exactly how the lack of OMP exerts its influence on the perception of odorant quality is unknown. However, there is considerable neurophysiological evidence that different odorants produce different spatiotemporal patterns of neural activity at the level of the mucosa and that these patterns predict the psychophysically determined perceptual relationship among odorants. In this respect, OMP gene deletion is known to result in a constellation of physiologic defects (i.e., marked reduction in the electroolfactogram (EOG) and altered response and recovery kinetics) that would be expected to alter the odorant-induced spatiotemporal activity patterns that are characteristic of different odorants. This, in turn, would be expected to alter the spatiotemporal patterning of information that results from the mucosal projection onto the bulb, thereby changing odorant quality perception. To test the hypothesis that odorant-induced mucosal activity patterns are altered in mice lacking the gene for OMP, we optically recorded the fluorescent changes in response to odorant stimulation from both the septum and turbinates of both OMP-null and control mice using a voltage-sensitive dye (di-4-ANEPPS Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) and a Dalsa 120 x 120, 12-bit CCD camera. To maintain continuity with the previous behavioral work, the odorants 2-propanol, citral, carvone, ethylacetoacetate, and propyl acetate were again used. Each odorant was randomly presented to each mucosal surface in a Latin-Square design. The results of this study demonstrated that, for both mouse strains, there do indeed exist different spatiotemporal activity patterns for different odorants. More importantly, however, these patterns significantly differed between OMP-null and control mice. That is, although the general regions of characteristic activity for different odorants were the same in both mouse strains, the patterns in the null animals were degraded relative to controls. These data suggest therefore that the alterations in mucosal activity may serve as the substrate for the behaviorally observed changes in odorant quality perception in the null mutant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12917392     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00806.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  17 in total

1.  A method for the rapid automated assessment of olfactory function.

Authors:  Steven L Youngentob
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Odorants with multiple oxygen-containing functional groups and other odorants with high water solubility preferentially activate posterior olfactory bulb glomeruli.

Authors:  Brett A Johnson; Spart Arguello; Michael Leon
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Immunocytochemical Localization of Olfactory-signaling Molecules in Human and Rat Spermatozoa.

Authors:  Yuliya Makeyeva; Christopher Nicol; William L Ledger; David K Ryugo
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.479

4.  The Odorant Receptor-Dependent Role of Olfactory Marker Protein in Olfactory Receptor Neurons.

Authors:  Michele Dibattista; Johannes Reisert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Ontogeny of the enhanced fetal-ethanol-induced behavioral and neurophysiologic olfactory response to ethanol odor.

Authors:  Amber M Eade; Paul R Sheehe; Steven L Youngentob
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Global expression profiling of globose basal cells and neurogenic progression within the olfactory epithelium.

Authors:  Richard C Krolewski; Adam Packard; James E Schwob
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Gestational naltrexone ameliorates fetal ethanol exposures enhancing effect on the postnatal behavioral and neural response to ethanol.

Authors:  Steven L Youngentob; Paul F Kent; Lisa M Youngentob
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2012-10-08

8.  Spatial representations of odorants in olfactory bulbs of rats and mice: similarities and differences in chemotopic organization.

Authors:  Brett A Johnson; Zhe Xu; Sameera S Ali; Michael Leon
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Olfactory marker protein modulates the cAMP kinetics of the odour-induced response in cilia of mouse olfactory receptor neurons.

Authors:  Johannes Reisert; King-Wai Yau; Frank L Margolis
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  The consequence of fetal ethanol exposure and adolescent odor re-exposure on the response to ethanol odor in adolescent and adult rats.

Authors:  Amber M Eade; Paul R Sheehe; Juan C Molina; Norman E Spear; Lisa M Youngentob; Steven L Youngentob
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.