OBJECTIVES: This prospective study focused on the evaluation of anti-parasitic therapy in congenital Chagas' disease, diagnosed and monitored by PCR and conventional diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 152 children born to seroreactive mothers, living in a non-endemic area. Fifty infants aged 0-6 months (GA) were diagnosed by microhaematocrit and PCR and 102 children aged 7 months to 17 years (GB) were diagnosed by serology and PCR. Forty treated patients were monitored for 2 or 3 years by PCR and conventional methods. A competitive-quantitative PCR was used to determine pre-therapy parasitic loads and follow their post-treatment evolution. RESULTS: In GA, the sensitivities of the PCR and microhaematocrit were 100% and 82.4% and their specificities 97% and 100%, respectively. In GB, the sensitivity of the PCR was 73.8% with a specificity of 100%. Pre-therapy parasitic loads ranged from 12.5 to 125,000 and 12.5 to 125 parasite genomic equivalents/mL of blood in GA and GB, respectively. PCR turned negative in all treated pre-therapy PCR positive patients before or at the end of treatment, which was followed by their seronegativation in 10/10 GA, in 3/5 children initiating therapy at 7 months to 2 years of age but in 0/16 initiating therapy at an older age. Two out of the latter patients were occasionally PCR positive during post-treatment, suggesting no parasitological response. Out of nine pre-therapy PCR negative patients, four turned seronegative after treatment, suggesting that in undetermined patients, undetectable parasitic burdens may lead to better post-treatment prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: PCR was useful for sensitive diagnosis and therapy monitoring, allowing early detection of refractory cases.
OBJECTIVES: This prospective study focused on the evaluation of anti-parasitic therapy in congenital Chagas' disease, diagnosed and monitored by PCR and conventional diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 152 children born to seroreactive mothers, living in a non-endemic area. Fifty infants aged 0-6 months (GA) were diagnosed by microhaematocrit and PCR and 102 children aged 7 months to 17 years (GB) were diagnosed by serology and PCR. Forty treated patients were monitored for 2 or 3 years by PCR and conventional methods. A competitive-quantitative PCR was used to determine pre-therapy parasitic loads and follow their post-treatment evolution. RESULTS: In GA, the sensitivities of the PCR and microhaematocrit were 100% and 82.4% and their specificities 97% and 100%, respectively. In GB, the sensitivity of the PCR was 73.8% with a specificity of 100%. Pre-therapy parasitic loads ranged from 12.5 to 125,000 and 12.5 to 125 parasite genomic equivalents/mL of blood in GA and GB, respectively. PCR turned negative in all treated pre-therapy PCR positive patients before or at the end of treatment, which was followed by their seronegativation in 10/10 GA, in 3/5 children initiating therapy at 7 months to 2 years of age but in 0/16 initiating therapy at an older age. Two out of the latter patients were occasionally PCR positive during post-treatment, suggesting no parasitological response. Out of nine pre-therapy PCR negative patients, four turned seronegative after treatment, suggesting that in undetermined patients, undetectable parasitic burdens may lead to better post-treatment prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: PCR was useful for sensitive diagnosis and therapy monitoring, allowing early detection of refractory cases.
Authors: J A Alvarado-Otegui; L A Ceballos; M M Orozco; G F Enriquez; M V Cardinal; C Cura; A G Schijman; U Kitron; R E Gürtler Journal: Acta Trop Date: 2012-07-03 Impact factor: 3.112
Authors: P L Marcet; T Duffy; M V Cardinal; J M Burgos; M A Lauricella; M J Levin; U Kitron; R E Gürtler; A G Schijman Journal: Parasitology Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Irene Losada Galván; Olaya Madrid Pascual; Juan María Herrero-Martínez; Ana Pérez-Ayala; Manuel Lizasoain Hernández Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Caryn Bern; Manuela Verastegui; Robert H Gilman; Carlos Lafuente; Gerson Galdos-Cardenas; Maritza Calderon; Juan Pacori; Maria Del Carmen Abastoflor; Hugo Aparicio; Mark F Brady; Lisbeth Ferrufino; Noelia Angulo; Sarah Marcus; Charles Sterling; James H Maguire Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2009-12-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Pierre Buekens; María Luisa Cafferata; Jackeline Alger; Fernando Althabe; José M Belizán; Norma Bustamante; Yves Carlier; Alvaro Ciganda; Jaime H Del Cid; Eric Dumonteil; Rubí Gamboa-León; Jorge A García; Luz Gibbons; Olga Graiff; Jesús Gurubel Maldonado; Claudia Herrera; Elizabeth Howard; Laura Susana Lara; Benjamín López; María Luisa Matute; María Jesús Ramírez-Sierra; María Cecilia Robles; Sergio Sosa-Estani; Carine Truyens; Christian Valladares; Dawn M Wesson; Concepción Zúniga Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2017-11-30 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Mirta C Remesar; Cecilia Gamba; Ivana F Colaianni; Mónica Puppo; Paula A Sartor; Edward L Murphy; Torsten B Neilands; María A Ridolfi; M Susana Leguizamón; Silvina Kuperman; Ana E Del Pozo Journal: Transfusion Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 3.157