Literature DB >> 12917184

A comparison of atropine and patching treatments for moderate amblyopia by patient age, cause of amblyopia, depth of amblyopia, and other factors.

.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the relative treatment effect of patching compared with atropine for moderate amblyopia varies according to patient age, cause of amblyopia or depth of amblyopia, and initial number of patching hours prescribed.
DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred nineteen children younger than 7 years of age with amblyopia in the range of 20/40 to 20/100.
METHODS: Patients were assigned randomly to receive treatment with either patching or atropine and followed up for 6 months. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Single-surrounded HOTV optotype visual acuity in the amblyopic eye after 6 months.
RESULTS: Improvement in the amblyopic eye visual acuity was slightly greater in the patching group compared with the atropine group in all subgroups based on patient characteristics. The relative treatment effect did not vary with age (P = 0.84), cause of amblyopia (P = 0.68), or baseline amblyopic eye acuity (P = 0.59). Patients with acuity of 20/80 to 20/100 who were prescribed 10 or more hours a day of patching showed a more rapid improvement in acuity than did patients prescribed a lesser amount of patching (P = 0.01) or than did patients in the atropine group (P < 0.001), but by 6 months, the differences were not significant (P = 0.47 and 0.15, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: A beneficial effect of both patching and atropine is present throughout the age range of 3 to younger than 7 years old and the acuity range of 20/40 to 20/100. Patients with acuity of 20/80 to 20/100 improve faster when a greater number of hours of patching is prescribed, but by 6 months, the amount of improvement is not related to the number of hours of patching initially prescribed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12917184     DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00500-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  27 in total

Review 1.  Amblyopia in children (aged 7 years or less).

Authors:  Stephanie West; Cathy Williams
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2016-01-05

Review 2.  Improving the performance of the amblyopic visual system.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; Roger W Li
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  An action video game for the treatment of amblyopia in children: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Christina Gambacorta; Mor Nahum; Indu Vedamurthy; Jessica Bayliss; Josh Jordan; Daphne Bavelier; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Amblyopia.

Authors:  Stephanie West; Cathy Williams
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-06-30

Review 5.  Amblyopia.

Authors:  Cathy Williams
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2009-09-16

6.  Conventional occlusion versus pharmacologic penalization for amblyopia.

Authors:  Tianjing Li; Riaz Qureshi; Kate Taylor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-08-28

7.  Photorefractive keratectomy for anisometropic amblyopia in children.

Authors:  Evelyn A Paysse
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2004

8.  Amblyopia therapy in Asian children: factors affecting visual outcome and parents' perception of children's attitudes towards amblyopia treatment.

Authors:  Swati Handa; Audrey Chia
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 1.858

9.  Refractory reverse amblyopia with atropine penalization.

Authors:  Preeti Ajit Patil; S Meenakshi; T S Surendran
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09

10.  Compliance of amblyopic patients with occlusion therapy: A pilot study.

Authors:  Sana Al-Zuhaibi; Iman Al-Harthi; Pascale Cooymans; Aisha Al-Busaidi; Yahya Al-Farsi; Anuradha Ganesh
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.