Literature DB >> 12916896

Heat and mass transfer scale-up issues during freeze-drying, I: atypical radiation and the edge vial effect.

Shailaja Rambhatla1, Michael J Pikal.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine whether radiation heat transfer is responsible for the position dependence of heat transfer known as the edge vial effect. Freeze drying was performed on a laboratory-scale freeze dryer using pure water with vials that were fully stoppered but had precision cut metal tubes inserted in them to ensure uniformity in resistance to vapor flow. Sublimation rates were determined gravimetrically. Vials were sputter-coated with gold and placed at selected positions on the shelf. Average sublimation rates were determined for vials located at the front, side, and center of an array of vials. Sublimation rates were also determined with and without the use of aluminum foil as a radiation shield. The effect of the guardrail material and its contribution to the edge vial effect by conduction heat transfer was studied by replacing the stainless steel band with a low-thermal conductivity material (styrofoam). The emissivities (epsilon) of relevant surfaces were measured using an infrared thermometer. Sublimation rate experiments were also conducted with vials suspended off the shelf to study the role of convection heat transfer. It was found that sublimation rates were significantly higher for vials located in the front compared to vials in the center. Additional radiation shields in the form of aluminum foil on the inside door resulted in a decrease in sublimation rates for the front vials and to a lesser extent, the center vials. There was a significant decrease in sublimation rate for gold-coated vials (epsilon approximately 0.4) placed at the front of an array when compared to that of clear vials (epsilon approximately 0.9). In the case of experiments with vials suspended off the shelf, the heat transfer coefficient was found to be independent of chamber pressure, indicating that pure convection plays no significant role in heat transfer. Higher sublimation rates were observed when the steel band was used instead of Styrofoam while the highest sublimation rates were obtained in the absence of the guardrail, indicating that the metal band can act as a thermal shield but also transmits some heat from the shelf via conduction and radiation. Atypical radiation heat transfer is responsible for higher sublimation rates for vials located at the front and side of an array. However, the guardrail contributes a little to heat transfer by conduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12916896      PMCID: PMC2750592          DOI: 10.1208/pt040214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech        ISSN: 1530-9932            Impact factor:   3.246


  5 in total

1.  The physico-chemical basis for the freeze-drying process.

Authors:  A P MacKenzie
Journal:  Dev Biol Stand       Date:  1976-10

Review 2.  Protein purification process engineering. Freeze drying: A practical overview.

Authors:  L A Gatlin; S L Nail
Journal:  Bioprocess Technol       Date:  1994

3.  Mass and heat transfer in vial freeze-drying of pharmaceuticals: role of the vial.

Authors:  M J Pikal; M L Roy; S Shah
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.534

4.  Use of laboratory data in freeze drying process design: heat and mass transfer coefficients and the computer simulation of freeze drying.

Authors:  M J Pikal
Journal:  J Parenter Sci Technol       Date:  1985 May-Jun

5.  The effect of chamber pressure on heat transfer in the freeze drying of parenteral solutions.

Authors:  S L Nail
Journal:  J Parenter Drug Assoc       Date:  1980 Sep-Oct
  5 in total
  14 in total

1.  Effects of vial packing density on drying rate during freeze-drying of carbohydrates or a model protein measured using a vial-weighing technique.

Authors:  Henning Gieseler; Geoffrey Lee
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Quality by design: scale-up of freeze-drying cycles in pharmaceutical industry.

Authors:  Roberto Pisano; Davide Fissore; Antonello A Barresi; Massimo Rastelli
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.246

3.  Determination of end point of primary drying in freeze-drying process control.

Authors:  Sajal M Patel; Takayuki Doen; Michael J Pikal
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 3.246

4.  Evaluation of a new wireless Temperature Remote Interrogation System (TEMPRIS) to measure product temperature during freeze drying.

Authors:  Stefan Schneid; Henning Gieseler
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 5.  Emerging freeze-drying process development and scale-up issues.

Authors:  Sajal Manubhai Patel; Michael J Pikal
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 3.246

6.  A QbD case study: Bayesian prediction of lyophilization cycle parameters.

Authors:  Linas Mockus; David LeBlond; Prabir K Basu; Rakhi B Shah; Mansoor A Khan
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 3.246

7.  Finite Element Method (FEM) Modeling of Freeze-drying: Monitoring Pharmaceutical Product Robustness During Lyophilization.

Authors:  Xiaodong Chen; Vikram Sadineni; Mita Maity; Yong Quan; Matthew Enterline; Rao V Mantri
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.246

8.  Heat and mass transfer scale-up issues during freeze drying: II. Control and characterization of the degree of supercooling.

Authors:  Shailaja Rambhatla; Roee Ramot; Chandan Bhugra; Michael J Pikal
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 3.246

9.  Model-Based Product Temperature and Endpoint Determination in Primary Drying of Lyophilization Processes.

Authors:  Alex Juckers; Petra Knerr; Frank Harms; Jochen Strube
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 6.525

10.  Demonstrating Functional Equivalence of Pilot and Production Scale Freeze-Drying of BCG.

Authors:  R Ten Have; K Reubsaet; P van Herpen; G Kersten; J-P Amorij
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.