Literature DB >> 12916654

Motivation and neuropsychological test performance following mild head injury.

Laurence M Binder1, Mark P Kelly, Michael R Villanueva, Michelle M Winslow.   

Abstract

Effect of motivation on neuropsychological test performance in mild head injury was assessed. Motivation was measured using the Portland Digit RecognitionTest. Three groups were compared: (a) mildhead injury, financial incentives, good motivation; (b) mild head injury, financial incentives, poor motivation; (c) moderate/severe head injury, good motivation. The neuropsychological battery included measures of sensory function, motor function, attention, intelligence, abstract reasoning, and memory. Mild head injury well motivated patients performed significantly better than the other two groups on some tests. Mild head injury poorly motivated individuals and moderate-severe head injury patients were indistinguishable on many tests. Consistent with previous reports, tactile sensory (finger recognition and Fingertip Number Writing Perception) and recognition memory (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning) tasks were identified as clinically useful measures of poor motivation. On these measures mild head injury well motivated examinees performed no better than moderate-severe patients, with both groups superior to mild head injury poorly motivated examinees. Sensitivity and specificity data are reported. Our measures of tactile sensation and verbal recognition memory were more affected by motivation than by the severity of head injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12916654     DOI: 10.1076/jcen.25.3.420.13806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol        ISSN: 1380-3395            Impact factor:   2.475


  3 in total

1.  Old dog, new tricks: the attentional set-shifting test as a novel cognitive behavioral task after controlled cortical impact injury.

Authors:  Corina O Bondi; Jeffrey P Cheng; Heather M Tennant; Christina M Monaco; Anthony E Kline
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 2.  Neurophysiological endophenotypes of schizophrenia: the viability of selected candidate measures.

Authors:  Bruce I Turetsky; Monica E Calkins; Gregory A Light; Ann Olincy; Allen D Radant; Neal R Swerdlow
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Effects of stereotype threat, perceived discrimination, and examiner race on neuropsychological performance: simple as black and white?

Authors:  April D Thames; Charles H Hinkin; Desiree A Byrd; Robert M Bilder; Kimberley J Duff; Monica Rivera Mindt; Alyssa Arentoft; Vanessa Streiff
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.892

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.