Literature DB >> 12916011

Combined analysis of two-year follow-up from two open-label randomized trials comparing efficacy of three nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbones for previously untreated HIV-1 infection: OzCombo 1 and 2.

J Amin1, A Moore, A Carr, M A French, M Law, S Emery, D A Cooper.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare inhibition of HIV replication, improvements in CD4+ T-cell counts, metabolic parameters, and body shape changes after 2 years of assigned therapy in OzCombo patients.
METHOD: Study participants were those who were recruited into the open-label OzCombo 1 (1996/1997) and OzCombo 2 (1997/1998) trials. Patients in OzCombo 1 were randomized to receive indinavir in combination with zidovudine+lamivudine (AZT+3TC; n = 35), stavudine (d4T)+3TC (n = 34), or d4T+didanosine (ddI) (n = 37). OzCombo 2 patients were randomized to the same nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) backbones with nevirapine (n = 20, 22, 23, respectively). The mean time-weighted changes from baseline in CD4 T-cell count/mL, HIV RNA (log copies/mL plasma), and proportions with detectable viral load (<500 copies plasma HIV RNA/mL) between NRTI arms over 2 years were compared by formal meta-analysis. A cross-sectional study of metabolic and body shape complications was also undertaken.
RESULTS: For the comparison of d4T+3TC and d4T+ddI to AZT+3TC, mean differences in time-weighted change from baseline in CD4 T-cell count/microL and log copies HIV RNA/mL adjusted for baseline CD4+ T-cell and HIV RNA counts were: -44 (p =.08) and -14 (p =.56) cells/microL and -0.1 (p =.40) and -0.1 (p =.6) copies/mL. Odds ratios for detectable viral load in the last study quarter were 0.6 (p =.44) and 1.0 (p =.95). The mean percent leg fat was lower in the d4T+3TC and d4T+ddI than the AZT+3TC arm (mean difference 5.1% [p =.07] and 7.6% [p =.02], respectively).
CONCLUSION: For all regimens, virological control and immunological response were maintained over 2 years. Regimens containing d4T and particularly d4T+ddI were significantly associated with increased peripheral fat loss compared with AZT+3TC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12916011     DOI: 10.1310/K2U9-QC2V-1Y3V-5DYF

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HIV Clin Trials        ISSN: 1528-4336


  5 in total

Review 1.  Do non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors contribute to lipodystrophy?

Authors:  David Nolan
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Trends in antiretroviral treatment use and treatment response in three Australian states in the first decade of combination antiretroviral treatment.

Authors:  Kathleen Falster; Linda Gelgor; Ansari Shaik; Iryna Zablotska; Garrett Prestage; Jeffrey Grierson; Rachel Thorpe; Marian Pitts; Jonathan Anderson; John Chuah; Brian Mulhall; Kathy Petoumenos; Anthony Kelleher; Matthew Law
Journal:  Sex Health       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.706

Review 3.  Didanosine enteric-coated capsule: current role in patients with HIV-1 infection.

Authors:  Santiago Moreno; Beatriz Hernández; Fernando Dronda
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Toxicities associated with dual nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor regimens in HIV-infected children.

Authors:  Russell B Van Dyke; Lu Wang; Paige L Williams
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Uptake of WHO recommendations for first-line antiretroviral therapy in Kenya, Uganda, and Zambia.

Authors:  Herbert C Duber; Emily Dansereau; Samuel H Masters; Jane Achan; Roy Burstein; Brendan DeCenso; Anne Gasasira; Gloria Ikilezi; Caroline Kisia; Felix Masiye; Pamela Njuguna; Thomas Odeny; Emelda Okiro; D Allen Roberts; Emmanuela Gakidou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.