Literature DB >> 12915715

Neurobehavioral assessment: a survey of use and value in safety assessment studies.

Lawrence D Middaugh1, Diana Dow-Edwards, Abby A Li, J David Sandler, Jennifer Seed, Larry P Sheets, Dana L Shuey, William Slikker, Walter P Weisenburger, L David Wise, Murray R Selwyn.   

Abstract

This report describes the results of a survey designed to evaluate the contribution of F1 neurobehavioral testing to hazard identification and characterization in safety assessment studies. (To review the details of the distributed survey, please see the supplementary data for this article on the journal's Web site.) The survey provided information about studies completed in industrial laboratories in the United States, Europe, and Japan since 1990 on 174 compounds. The types of compounds included were pharmaceutical (81%), agricultural (7%), industrial (1%), or were undefined (10%). Information collected included the intended use of the test agent, general study design and methodology, the types and characteristics of F1 behavioral evaluations, and the frequency with which agents affected neurobehavioral parameters in comparison to other F0 and F1 generation parameters. F1 general toxicology parameters such as mortality, pre- and postweaning body weight, and food intake were assessed in most studies and were affected more frequently than other parameters by the test agents. F1 behavioral parameters were assessed less consistently across studies, and were less frequently affected by the agents tested. Although affected by agents less often than general toxicology parameters, F1 behavioral parameters along with other parameters defined the no-observed-effect level (NOEL) in 17/113 (15%) of studies and solely defined the NOEL in 3/113 (2.6%) of studies. Thus, F1 behavioral parameters sometimes improved on the standard toxicological measures of hazard identification. While not detecting agent effects as readily as some measures, the F1 behavioral parameters provide information about agent effects on specialized functions of developing offspring not provided by other standard measures of toxicity. The survey results emphasize the need for further research into the methods of behavioral assessment as well as the mechanisms underlying the neurobehavioral alterations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12915715     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfg211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  7 in total

Review 1.  Translating neurobehavioural endpoints of developmental neurotoxicity tests into in vitro assays and readouts.

Authors:  Christoph van Thriel; Remco H S Westerink; Christian Beste; Ambuja S Bale; Pamela J Lein; Marcel Leist
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 2.  Neurobehavioral science in hazard identification and risk assessment of neurotoxic agents--what are the requirements for further development?

Authors:  Roberto Lucchini; Elisa Albini; Laura Benedetti; Lorenzo Alessio
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-05-13       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Neuraxial labor analgesia for vaginal delivery and its effects on childhood learning disabilities.

Authors:  Randall P Flick; Kunmoo Lee; Ryan E Hofer; Charles W Beinborn; Ellen M Hambel; Melissa K Klein; Paul W Gunn; Robert T Wilder; Slavica K Katusic; Darrell R Schroeder; David O Warner; Juraj Sprung
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Early exposure to anesthesia and learning disabilities in a population-based birth cohort.

Authors:  Robert T Wilder; Randall P Flick; Juraj Sprung; Slavica K Katusic; William J Barbaresi; Christopher Mickelson; Stephen J Gleich; Darrell R Schroeder; Amy L Weaver; David O Warner
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 5.  Pesticide exposure and neurodevelopmental outcomes: review of the epidemiologic and animal studies.

Authors:  Carol J Burns; Laura J McIntosh; Pamela J Mink; Anne M Jurek; Abby A Li
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.393

Review 6.  A retrospective performance assessment of the developmental neurotoxicity study in support of OECD test guideline 426.

Authors:  Susan L Makris; Kathleen Raffaele; Sandra Allen; Wayne J Bowers; Ulla Hass; Enrico Alleva; Gemma Calamandrei; Larry Sheets; Patric Amcoff; Nathalie Delrue; Kevin M Crofton
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  A Recombinant Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Line Stably Expressing Halide-Sensitive YFP-I152L for GABAAR and GlyR-Targeted High-Throughput Drug Screening and Toxicity Testing.

Authors:  Katharina Kuenzel; Oliver Friedrich; Daniel F Gilbert
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 5.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.