Literature DB >> 12915640

Adult height after long-term, continuous growth hormone (GH) treatment in short children born small for gestational age: results of a randomized, double-blind, dose-response GH trial.

Yvonne Van Pareren1, Paul Mulder, Mieke Houdijk, Maarten Jansen, Maarten Reeser, Anita Hokken-Koelega.   

Abstract

The GH dose-response effect of long-term continuous GH treatment on adult height (AH) was evaluated in 54 short children born small for gestational age (SGA) who were participating in a randomized, double-blind, dose-response trial. Patients were randomly and blindly assigned to treatment with either 3 IU (group A) or 6 IU (group B) GH/m(2).d ( approximately 0.033 or 0.067 mg/kg.d, respectively). The mean (+/-SD) birth length was -3.6 (1.4), the age at the start of the study was 8.1 (1.9) yr, and the height SD score (SDS) at the start of the study -3.0 (0.7). Seventeen of the 54 children were partially GH deficient (stimulated GH peak, 10-20 mU/liter). Fifteen non-GH-treated, non-GH-deficient, short children born SGA, with similar inclusion criteria, served as controls [mean (+/-SD) birth length, -3.3 (1.2); age at start, 7.8 (1.7) yr; height SDS at start, -2.6 (0.5)]. GH treatment resulted in an AH above -2 SDS in 85% of the children after a mean (+/-SD) GH treatment period of 7.8 (1.7) yr. The mean (SD) AH SDS was -1.1 (0.7) for group A and -0.9 (0.8) for group B, resulting from a mean (+/-SD) gain in height SDS of 1.8 (0.7) for group A and 2.1 (0.8) for group B. No significant differences between groups A and B were found for AH SDS (mean difference, 0.3 SDS; 95% confidence interval, -0.2, 0.6; P > 0.2) and gain in height SDS (mean difference, 0.3 SDS; 95% confidence interval, -0.1, 0.7; P > 0.1). When corrected for target height, the mean corrected AH SDS was -0.2 (0.8) for group A and -0.4 (0.9) for group B. The mean (+/-SD) AH SDS of the control group [-2.3 (0.7)] was significantly lower than that of the GH-treated group (P < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis indicated the following predictive variables for AH SDS: target height SDS, height SDS, and chronological age minus bone age (years) at the start of the study. GH dose had no significant effect. In conclusion, long-term continuous GH treatment in short children born SGA without signs of persistent catch-up growth leads to a normalization of AH, even with a GH dose of 3 IU/m(2).d ( approximately 0.033 mg/kg.d).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12915640     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2002-021172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  35 in total

Review 1.  Growth hormone therapy.

Authors:  Anurag Bajpai; P Sn Menon
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 2.  Growth hormone treatment in non-growth hormone-deficient children.

Authors:  Sandro Loche; Luisanna Carta; Anastasia Ibba; Chiara Guzzetti
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-03-31

3.  First-year predictors of health-related quality of life changes in short-statured children treated with human growth hormone.

Authors:  J Quitmann; J Bloemeke; H-G Dörr; M Bullinger; S Witt; N Silva
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Age at menarche and adult height in girls born small for gestational age.

Authors:  Young Suk Shim; Hong Kyu Park; Seung Yang; Il Tae Hwang
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-06-30

5.  Small for gestation and growth hormone therapy.

Authors:  Archana Dayal Arya
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 6.  Small for gestational age: towards 2004.

Authors:  Z Zadik; O Dimant; A Zung; R Reifen
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 7.  Should recombinant human growth hormone therapy be used in short small for gestational age children?

Authors:  L B Johnston; M O Savage
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Recombinant human growth hormone for children born small for gestational age: meta-analysis confirms the consistent dose-effect relationship on catch-up growth.

Authors:  R Crabbé; M von Holtey; P Engrand; P Chatelain
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 9.  Current Insights into the Role of the Growth Hormone-Insulin-Like Growth Factor System in Short Children Born Small for Gestational Age.

Authors:  Judith S Renes; Jaap van Doorn; Anita C S Hokken-Koelega
Journal:  Horm Res Paediatr       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 2.852

10.  Treatment of short stature and growth hormone deficiency in children with somatotropin (rDNA origin).

Authors:  Dana S Hardin
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2008-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.