Dario M Torre1, James L Sebastian, Deborah E Simpson. 1. Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Clement J. Zablocki Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Milwaukee, 53226, USA. dtorre@mcw.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: To identify learning activities that students associate with high-quality teaching on a clinical rotation. METHOD: From July to December 2001, data on patient encounters, learning activities, and teaching quality were collected via personal hand-held computers from 82 medical students during a required third-year internal medicine (IM) clerkship at the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. Univariate (chi-square test) and multivariate analysis (stepwise multiple logistic regression) were performed to assess the association between learning activities and students' perceptions of teaching quality during this rotation. RESULTS: A total of 1,839 patient encounters were recorded: 62% of these occurred in the inpatient setting and 38% in outpatient clinics. In 80% of all encounters, students reported that they gave an oral case presentation and proposed a plan; they reported receiving high-quality feedback after 64% of these presentations. Univariate analysis demonstrated that the students' perception of high-quality teaching was associated with being on an inpatient rotation, formulating an assessment, proposing a plan, presenting to the attending physician with other members of the team present, giving an oral case presentation, and receiving high-quality feedback (p <.01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that receiving high-quality feedback (odds ratio [OR] 4.5; 95% CI 3.57-6.25) and proposing a plan (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.4-3.9) were the two strongest predictors of high, overall teaching quality. CONCLUSION: Receiving high-quality feedback from faculty and proposing a plan were the learning activities most strongly associated with students' perception of high-quality teaching on a required third-year IM clerkship.
PURPOSE: To identify learning activities that students associate with high-quality teaching on a clinical rotation. METHOD: From July to December 2001, data on patient encounters, learning activities, and teaching quality were collected via personal hand-held computers from 82 medical students during a required third-year internal medicine (IM) clerkship at the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. Univariate (chi-square test) and multivariate analysis (stepwise multiple logistic regression) were performed to assess the association between learning activities and students' perceptions of teaching quality during this rotation. RESULTS: A total of 1,839 patient encounters were recorded: 62% of these occurred in the inpatient setting and 38% in outpatient clinics. In 80% of all encounters, students reported that they gave an oral case presentation and proposed a plan; they reported receiving high-quality feedback after 64% of these presentations. Univariate analysis demonstrated that the students' perception of high-quality teaching was associated with being on an inpatient rotation, formulating an assessment, proposing a plan, presenting to the attending physician with other members of the team present, giving an oral case presentation, and receiving high-quality feedback (p <.01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that receiving high-quality feedback (odds ratio [OR] 4.5; 95% CI 3.57-6.25) and proposing a plan (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.4-3.9) were the two strongest predictors of high, overall teaching quality. CONCLUSION: Receiving high-quality feedback from faculty and proposing a plan were the learning activities most strongly associated with students' perception of high-quality teaching on a required third-year IM clerkship.
Authors: Teresa A O'Sullivan; Carmen Lau; Mitul Patel; Chi Mac; Janelle Krueger; Jennifer Danielson; Stanley S Weber Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2015-12-25 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Robbert Duvivier; Renée Stalmeijer; Jan van Dalen; Cees van der Vleuten; Albert Scherpbier Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Jed D Gonzalo; Brian S Heist; Briar L Duffy; Liselotte Dyrbye; Mark J Fagan; Gary Ferenchick; Heather Harrell; Paul A Hemmer; Walter N Kernan; Jennifer R Kogan; Colleen Rafferty; Raymond Wong; Michael D Elnicki Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2014-10-10 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Ryan A Meverden; Jason H Szostek; Saswati Mahapatra; Cathy D Schleck; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Thomas J Beckman; Christopher M Wittich Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 2.463