Literature DB >> 12915298

Acquiring an understanding of design: evidence from children's insight problem solving.

Margaret Anne Defeyter1, Tim P German.   

Abstract

The human ability to make tools and use them to solve problems may not be zoologically unique, but it is certainly extraordinary. Yet little is known about the conceptual machinery that makes humans so competent at making and using tools. Do adults and children have concepts specialized for understanding human-made artifacts? If so, are these concepts deployed in attempts to solve novel problems? Here we present new data, derived from problem-solving experiments, which support the following. (i) The structure of the child's concept of artifact function changes profoundly between ages 5 and 7. At age 5, the child's conceptual machinery defines the function of an artifact as any goal a user might have; by age 7, its function is defined by the artifact's typical or intended use. (ii) This conceptual shift has a striking effect on problem-solving performance, i.e. the child's concept of artifact function appears to be deployed in problem solving. (iii) This effect on problem solving is not caused by differences in the amount of knowledge that children have about the typical use of a particular tool; it is mediated by the structure of the child's artifact concept (which organizes and deploys the child's knowledge). In two studies, children between 5 and 7 years of age were matched for their knowledge of what a particular artifact "is for", and then given a problem that can only be solved if that tool is used for an atypical purpose. All children performed well in a baseline condition. But when they were primed by a demonstration of the artifact's typical function, 5-year-old children solved the problem much faster than 6-7-year-old children. Because all children knew what the tools were for, differences in knowledge alone cannot explain the results. We argue that the older children were slower to solve the problem when the typical function was primed because (i) their artifact concept plays a role in problem solving, and (ii) intended purpose is central to their concept of artifact function, but not to that of the younger children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12915298     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00098-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  17 in total

1.  Goal-directed action representation in autism.

Authors:  Tiziana Zalla; Nelly Labruyere; Nicolas Georgieff
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2006-05

Review 2.  A matched filter hypothesis for cognitive control.

Authors:  Evangelia G Chrysikou; Matthew J Weber; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Action experience alters 3-month-old infants' perception of others' actions.

Authors:  Jessica A Sommerville; Amanda L Woodward; Amy Needham
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-05

4.  Experience matters: the impact of doing versus watching on infants' subsequent perception of tool-use events.

Authors:  Jessica A Sommerville; Elina A Hildebrand; Catharyn C Crane
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2008-09

5.  Apperception in primed problem solving.

Authors:  Sacha Helfenstein; Pertti Saariluoma
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2007-10-13

6.  A developmental examination of the conceptual structure of animal, artifact, and human social categories across two cultural contexts.

Authors:  Marjorie Rhodes; Susan A Gelman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Infants learn enduring functions of novel tools from action demonstrations.

Authors:  Mikołaj Hernik; Gergely Csibra
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2014-11-14

8.  Comparing the performances of apes (Gorilla gorilla, Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus) and human children (Homo sapiens) in the floating peanut task.

Authors:  Daniel Hanus; Natacha Mendes; Claudio Tennie; Josep Call
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Apes have culture but may not know that they do.

Authors:  Thibaud Gruber; Klaus Zuberbühler; Fabrice Clément; Carel van Schaik
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-06

10.  The malleability of developmental trends in neutral and negative memory illusions.

Authors:  Henry Otgaar; Mark L Howe; Nathalie Brackmann; Tom Smeets
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.