Literature DB >> 12915166

A two-stage model of peer influence in adolescent substance use: individual and relationship-specific differences in susceptibility to influence.

Kathryn A Urberg1, Qing Luo, Colleen Pilgrim, Serdar M Degirmencioglu.   

Abstract

A two-stage model of peer influence was proposed. The model served as a framework for examining individual and relationship-specific differences in susceptibility to influence. The two stages are (1) the acquisition of a peer context and (2) conforming to the behavior of a peer. Data from a four-wave longitudinal study were used to assess (1) the initial selection of cigarette- and alcohol-using peers and (2) influence from peers. Relationship factors and variables identified as risk factors for substance use were hypothesized to increase susceptibility to peer influence. The results indicated that adolescents who did not value school achievement or spending time with parents were more apt than others to choose friends who smoked cigarettes more than they did. Adolescents who chose friends who drank more than they did not differ from other adolescents on any of the risk factors. Thus, low-risk adolescents were as likely to acquire a friend context where drinking was likely to occur as were adolescents who had more risk factors. When the second stage was examined, only high peer acceptance and high friendship quality resulted in adolescents being more apt to conform to their friend's substance-use behaviors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12915166     DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4603(02)00256-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addict Behav        ISSN: 0306-4603            Impact factor:   3.913


  57 in total

1.  Attitudes and Beliefs About New Psychoactive Substance Use Among Electronic Dance Music Party Attendees.

Authors:  Joseph J Palamar; Patricia Acosta; Charles M Cleland
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 2.164

2.  A social contextual analysis of youth cigarette smoking development.

Authors:  Susan T Ennett; Vangie A Foshee; Karl E Bauman; Andrea Hussong; Robert Faris; John R Hipp; Li Cai
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Peer selection and socialization in adolescent depression: the role of school transitions.

Authors:  Natalie P Goodwin; Sylvie Mrug; Casey Borch; Antonius H N Cillessen
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2011-10-19

4.  Challenges to the peer influence paradigm: results for 12-13 year olds from six European countries from the European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach study.

Authors:  H de Vries; M Candel; R Engels; L Mercken
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Do adolescent ecstasy users have different attitudes towards drugs when compared to marijuana users?

Authors:  Silvia S Martins; Carla L Storr; Pierre K Alexandre; Howard D Chilcoat
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Peer smoking, other peer attributes, and adolescent cigarette smoking: a social network analysis.

Authors:  Susan T Ennett; Robert Faris; John Hipp; Vangie A Foshee; Karl E Bauman; Andrea Hussong; Li Cai
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2008-04-11

Review 7.  Moderators of the association between peer and target adolescent substance use.

Authors:  Shawn Marschall-Lévesque; Natalie Castellanos-Ryan; Frank Vitaro; Jean R Séguin
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 3.913

8.  Prospective Associations of Actual and Perceived Descriptive Norms with Drinking Among Emerging Adults.

Authors:  Bruce Simons-Morton; Denise Haynie; Joe Bible; Danping Liu
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.164

9.  The effect of subjective normative social images of smokers on children's intentions to smoke.

Authors:  Judy A Andrews; Sarah Hampson; Maureen Barckley
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.244

10.  Intergenerational Continuity in Substance Abuse: Does Offspring's Friendship Network Make a Difference?

Authors:  Kimberly L Henry; Celia J Fulco; Della V Agbeke; Anastasia M Ratcliff
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.012

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.