Signal detection behavior in humans and rats: a comparison with matched tasks.

Animal models of human cognitive processes are essential for studying the neurobiological mechanisms of these processes and for developing therapies for intoxication and neurodegenerative diseases. A discrete-trial signal detection task was developed for assessing sustained attention in rats; a previous study showed that rats perform as predicted from the human sustained attention literature. In this study, we measured the behavior of humans in a task formally homologous to the task for rats, varying two of the three parameters previously shown to affect performance in rats. Signal quality was manipulated by varying the increment in the intensity of a lamp. Trial rate was varied among values of 4, 7, and 10 trials/min. Accuracy of signal detection was quantified by the proportion of correct detections of the signal (P(hit)) and the proportion of false alarms (P(fa), i.e. incorrect responses on non-signal trials). As with rats, P(hit) in humans increased with increasing signal intensity whereas P(fa) did not. Like rats, humans were sensitive to the trial rate, though the change in behavior depended on the sex of the subject. These data show that visual signal detection behavior in rats and humans is controlled similarly by two important parameters, and suggest that this task assesses similar processes of sustained attention in the two species.