Literature DB >> 12914269

Indications, techniques, and outcomes of posterior surgery for chronic low back pain.

Brain K Kwon1, Alexander R Vaccaro, Jonathan N Grauer, John Beiner.   

Abstract

This article summarizes a number of issues surrounding the diagnosis, indications, and techniques of posterior lumbar spine surgery for chronic low back pain. It would not be entirely unjustified for a spine surgeon to adhere to a totally avoidant approach to chronic low back pain, rationalized by a reasonably legitimate nihilism regarding the presently available means of diagnosing and surgically managing low back pain [64]. Judging by the number of lumbar fusions performed in North America and the tremendous intellectual and financial investment currently being made in technologies to enhance spinal fusion, such an approach is evidently not achieving wide-spread acceptance on this continent. A rationale approach is therefore required for the many low back pain sufferers with degenerative disk disease who arrive in the office having exhausted almost every imaginable form of nonoperative therapy. Every effort should be made to establish a pathoanatomic etiology of the back pain with a combination of diagnostic modalities. Surgical intervention should be approached cautiously and only after extensive dialog with the patient to establish realistic goals and expectations. Posteriorly performed interbody fusion procedures may provide a high fusion rate and satisfactory clinical outcomes for this challenging problem, although further research is necessary to determine more conclusively the role of surgery and the relative effectiveness of the various arthrodesis techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12914269     DOI: 10.1016/s0030-5898(03)00014-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am        ISSN: 0030-5898            Impact factor:   2.472


  4 in total

1.  Case-control study of risk factors for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation in Croatian island populations.

Authors:  Robert Saftić; Matijana Grgić; Barbara Ebling; Bruno Splavski
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.351

2.  MRI findings after successful vertebroplasty.

Authors:  David M Dansie; Patrick H Luetmer; John I Lane; Kent R Thielen; John T Wald; David F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Fluid sign in the treated bodies after percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Chao-Chun Lin; Pao-Sheng Yen; Shu-Hui Wen
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 4.  Does Workers' Compensation Status Affect Outcomes after Lumbar Spine Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Fabrizio Russo; Sergio De Salvatore; Luca Ambrosio; Gianluca Vadalà; Luca Fontana; Rocco Papalia; Jorma Rantanen; Sergio Iavicoli; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.