Literature DB >> 12913869

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: an evaluation of the prognostic value of the lung-to-head ratio and other prenatal parameters.

J A M Laudy1, M Van Gucht, M F Van Dooren, J W Wladimiroff, D Tibboel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A retrospective analysis of the prognostic significance of the lung-to-head ratio (LHR) and other prenatal parameters on the outcome of fetuses with left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH).
METHODS: A total of 26 fetuses with isolated left CDH without chromosomal abnormalities were included. Twenty-one LHR measurements could retrospectively be calculated from the last available ultrasonographic recordings before birth. The relationship between LHR and fetal outcome and the gestational age dependency of this relation was tested. Cutoff levels as previously published were applied to determine their predictive value in this population. The association between other prenatal predictive variables and fetal outcome was also determined. Survival was defined as discharge from the hospital.
RESULTS: The overall survival rate was 50%. There was a statistically significant difference between the mean LHR of the survivors compared to the mean LHR of the nonsurvivors (1.78 vs 1.02), whereas the mean gestational age of these two groups did not differ. LHR was not gestational age dependent in the prediction of fetal outcome. The cutoff levels LHR <1, 1-1.4, >1.4 showed a good applicability in the prediction of fetal outcome within the present study population with a 100% survival if LHR >1.4 and a 100% mortality if LHR <1. An intrathoracic position of the stomach, mediastinal shift, polyhydramnios as individual variables and early diagnosis (<25 weeks' gestation) revealed to be poor sonographic predictors for fetal outcome.
CONCLUSION: LHR proved to be a good predictor for fetal outcome, independent of gestational age at the time of the measurement. To substantiate our observation, a prospective multicenter study is warranted. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12913869     DOI: 10.1002/pd.654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  23 in total

1.  Tracheobronchomegaly following intrauterine tracheal occlusion for congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Authors:  Goya Enriquez; Lina Cadavid; Enrique Garcés-Iñigo; Amparo Castellote; Joaquim Piqueras; Jose Luis Peiró; Elena Carreras
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-05-29

2.  Extracorporeal life support in patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: how long should we treat?

Authors:  David W Kays; Saleem Islam; Douglas S Richards; Shawn D Larson; Joy M Perkins; James L Talbert
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: an evaluation of the prognostic value of the lung-to-head ratio.

Authors:  Shuichiro Yoshimura; Hideaki Masuzaki; Koichi Hiraki; Kiyonori Miura; Daisuke Nakayama; Tadayuki Ishimaru
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.314

4.  Current advances in prenatal imaging of congenital diaphragmatic [corrected] hernia.

Authors:  Beth M Kline-Fath
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-07-08

Review 5.  Fetal surgical intervention: progress and perspectives.

Authors:  Jesse D Vrecenak; Alan W Flake
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Correlation of MRI Brain Injury Findings with Neonatal Clinical Factors in Infants with Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.

Authors:  R Radhakrishnan; S Merhar; J Meinzen-Derr; B Haberman; F Y Lim; P Burns; E Zorn; B Kline-Fath
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Repetitive MR measurements of lung volume in fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: individual development of pulmonary hypoplasia during pregnancy and calculation of weekly lung growth rates.

Authors:  Claudia Hagelstein; Meike Weidner; A Kristina Kilian; Angelika Debus; Anna Walleyo; Stefan O Schoenberg; Thomas Schaible; Sven Kehl; Karen A Büsing; K Wolfgang Neff
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Risk factors for congenital diaphragmatic hernia in the Bogota birth defects surveillance and follow-up program, Colombia.

Authors:  Ana M García; S Machicado; G Gracia; I M Zarante
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 9.  Can we improve outcome of congenital diaphragmatic hernia?

Authors:  L van den Hout; I Sluiter; S Gischler; A De Klein; R Rottier; H Ijsselstijn; I Reiss; D Tibboel
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 10.  Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: current status and review of the literature.

Authors:  Anthony S de Buys Roessingh; Anh Tuan Dinh-Xuan
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.