Literature DB >> 12913726

Asian race and impact on outcomes after radical radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Ada Man1, Tom Pickles, Kim N Chi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared survival outcomes in patients of Asian descent treated with curative intent radiation therapy for prostate cancer with that in the nonAsian population in British Columbia, Canada.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Since 1994, 1,872 men treated with curative intent radiotherapy for prostate cancer have been followed prospectively at our provincial institution, where cancer care delivery is coordinated for the province of British Columbia. Patients are treated uniformly based on provincial policies and guidelines. Patients were divided into 63 Asian (3.6%) and 1,804 nonAsian (96.4%) patients by surname with Asian names checked by telephone contact. Three risk groups were defined based on pretreatment prostate specific antigen, biopsy Gleason score and clinical T staging. For the whole cohort and each risk group survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and comparisons were made between the Asian and nonAsian populations.
RESULTS: The mean age of Asian and nonAsian men was 71.5 and 71 years, respectively. Median prostate specific antigen was 11.4 and 10 ng/ml, respectively (p = 0.7). Median Gleason score was 7 for Asian patients and 6 for nonAsian patients (p = 0.002). There were twice the percentage of Asian patients with Gleason scores 8 or greater than nonAsian (26.5% vs 13.8%, p = 0.003). More Asian patients had stage 3 or 4 disease than nonAsian (44.8% vs 34.9%, p = 0.095). A greater proportion of Asian patients were classified as being at high risk than the nonAsian population (60.3% vs 47.6%, p = 0.04). For the entire cohort, and the low, intermediate and high risk groups there were no differences in time to first failure, or cause specific or overall survival for Asian vs nonAsian men.
CONCLUSIONS: A greater proportion of patients of Asian descent present with high risk prostate cancer than nonAsian patients, which could be due to intrinsic biological differences and/or differences in diagnostic patterns. Survival outcomes after radiotherapy are the same for the 2 populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12913726     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000081423.37043.b4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  15 in total

1.  Validation of revised Epstein's criteria for insignificant prostate cancer prediction in a Greek subpopulation.

Authors:  Κ Chondros; Ν Karpathakis; Ι Heretis; Ε Mavromanolakis; N Chondros; F Sofras; C Mamoulakis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 0.471

2.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Contemporary Selection Criteria in Prostate Cancer Patients Eligible for Active Surveillance: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yu Fan; Yelin Mulati; Lingyun Zhai; Yuke Chen; Yu Wang; Juefei Feng; Wei Yu; Qian Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Prostate Cancer Disparities in Risk Group at Presentation and Access to Treatment for Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders: A Study With Disaggregated Ethnic Groups.

Authors:  Bhav Jain; Kenrick Ng; Patricia Mae G Santos; Kekoa Taparra; Vinayak Muralidhar; Brandon A Mahal; Neha Vapiwala; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Paul L Nguyen; Edward Christopher Dee
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-10-28

4.  Biochemical outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with follow-up more than 5-years.

Authors:  Kwang Hyun Kim; Sey Kiat Lim; Tae-Young Shin; Byung Ha Chung; Sung Joon Hong; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Prostate cancer risk profiles of Asian-American men: disentangling the effects of immigration status and race/ethnicity.

Authors:  Daphne Y Lichtensztajn; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Weiva Sieh; Benjamin I Chung; Iona Cheng; James D Brooks
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Is it suitable to eliminate bone scan for prostate cancer patients with PSA ≤ 20 ng/mL?

Authors:  Seung Hwan Lee; Mun Su Chung; Kyung Kgi Park; Chan Dong Yom; Dae Hoon Lee; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Are clinically insignificant prostate cancers really insignificant among Korean men?

Authors:  Chan Dong Yeom; Seung Hwan Lee; Kyung Kgi Park; Sang Un Park; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 8.  East meets West: ethnic differences in prostate cancer epidemiology between East Asians and Caucasians.

Authors:  Tomomi Kimura
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2011-11-15

9.  Are preoperative Kattan and Stephenson nomograms predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy applicable in the Chinese population?

Authors:  Victor H W Yeung; Yi Chiu; Sylvia S Y Yu; W H Au; Steve W H Chan
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-03-05

10.  How Much Reliable Is the Current Belief on Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer?

Authors:  Mun Su Chung; Yeong Jin Choi; Young Sub Lee; Byung Il Yoon; U-Syn Ha
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.201

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.