Literature DB >> 12913701

Clinical characteristics of ureteral calculi detected by nonenhanced computerized tomography after unclear results of plain radiography and ultrasonography.

Takashi Kobayashi1, Koji Nishizawa, Jun Watanabe, Keiji Ogura.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Prospective non-enhanced computerized tomography (CT) was performed for patients presenting with renal colic and showing negative or equivocal results on plain x-ray of the kidneys, ureters and bladder (KUB) as well as ultrasonography (US) to evaluate the usefulness of plain CT. We also evaluated the clinical characteristics of urinary calculi detected under such conditions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2000 and June 2002, 560 patients presented with acute unilateral renal colic. Of these patients 238 negative or equivocal for ureteral calculus on KUB and US underwent non-enhanced CT. The diagnostic value of plain CT in patients with negative or equivocal KUB and US was determined, and results and other clinical findings were compared. Clinical characteristics of ureteral stones detected by plain CT were compared with those of stones diagnosed by KUB and US.
RESULTS: By plain CT 143 (60.1%) and 6 (2.5%) cases of pain were determined to have been caused by ureteral stones and other pathogeneses, respectively. No definitive diagnosis was obtained in 89 (37.4%). Stone size detected by plain CT was significantly smaller than controls (3.77 vs 6.37 mm, p <0.0001) and tended to be located in the middle or lower ureter (76.2% or 109 of 143 vs 52.2% or 168 of 322, p <0.0001). Symptoms spontaneously improved in 137 (95.8%) after conservative therapy while 6 underwent intervention, a rate significantly lower (p <0.0001) than controls (32.9% or 106 of 322).
CONCLUSIONS: Non-enhanced CT is a useful modality for diagnosis of patients presenting with acute renal colic but whose results are negative or equivocal on KUB and US. Excretory urography is rarely needed because stones undetected on KUB and US tend to be small and in the middle or lower ureter, and spontaneous passage is expected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12913701     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000081424.44254.45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  8 in total

1.  Hospital cost analysis of management of patients with renal colic in the emergency department.

Authors:  Ibrahim Turkcuer; Mustafa Serinken; Ozgur Karcioglu; Mehmet Zencir; M Kemal Keysan
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-12-24

2.  Ultrasound-guided percutaneous antegrade pyelography with computed tomography for the diagnosis of spontaneous partial ureteral rupture in a dog.

Authors:  Swan Specchi; Giuseppe Lacava; Marc-André d'Anjou; Eric Zini; Edoardo Auriemma
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Construction of a novel rabbit model of ureteral calculi implanted with flowable resin.

Authors:  Hao Su; Heng Liu; Ke Yang; Weiming Chen; Dongbo Yuan; Wei Wang; Guohua Zhu; Bin Hu; Kehua Jiang; Jianguo Zhu
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.090

Review 4.  [Diagnosis and therapy of acute ureteral colic].

Authors:  Thomas H Forster; Gernot Bonkat; Stephen Wyler; Robin Ruszat; Nicole Ebinger; Thomas C Gasser; Alexander Bachmann
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.704

5.  Evaluation of pediatric nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Paul J Kokorowski; Katherine Hubert; Caleb P Nelson
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010-10

6.  Expectant Management of Ureter Stones: Outcome and Clinical Factors of Spontaneous Passage in a Single Institution's Experience.

Authors:  Dong-Un Tchey; Yun Sok Ha; Won Tae Kim; Seok Joong Yun; Sang Cheol Lee; Wun Jae Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-12-20

7.  Is pre-operative imaging essential prior to ureteric stone surgery?

Authors:  F R Youssef; B A Wilkinson; K J Hastie; J Hall
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Assessment of factors affecting the spontaneous passage of lower ureteric calculus on the basis of lower ureteric calculus diameter, density, and plasma C- reactive protein level.

Authors:  Ajayraj Hada; Sher Singh Yadav; Vinay Tomar; Shivam Priyadarshi; Neeraj Agarwal; Anil Gulani
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.