Literature DB >> 12913040

Birthweight and perinatal mortality: paradoxes, social class, and sibling dependencies.

Kari Klungsøyr Melve1, Rolv Skjaerven.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Birthweight distributions among second-born infants depend on the birthweights of older siblings, with implications for weight-specific perinatal mortality. We wanted to study whether these relations were explained by socioeconomic levels, and to study time trends in a situation with decreasing perinatal mortality rates.
METHODS: Births in the Norwegian Medical Birth Registry from 1967 to 1998 were linked to their mothers through their national identification numbers. The study population was 546 688 mothers with at least two singletons weighing >/==" BORDER="0">500 g at birth. Weight-specific perinatal mortality for second-born siblings in families with first-born siblings in either the highest or the lowest birthweight quartile was analysed. Maternal education and cohabitation status were used as measures of socioeconomic level.
RESULTS: For all 500-g categories below 3500 g, mortality rates were significantly higher among second-born infants with an older sibling in the highest rather than the lowest weight quartile. This pattern was the same across three educational levels. The exclusion of preterm births did not change the effect pattern. A comparison of perinatal mortality among second siblings in terms of relative birthweight (z-scores) showed a reversal of the relative risks, although these were only significantly different from unity for the smallest infants. Conclusion The crossover in weight-specific perinatal mortality for second siblings by weight of first sibling is largely independent of socioeconomic level, and is not weakened by the decreasing perinatal mortality rates in the population over time. Family data should be taken into consideration when evaluating the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome relating to weight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12913040     DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyg163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  6 in total

Review 1.  When is birthweight at term abnormally low? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association and predictive ability of current birthweight standards for neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  G L Malin; R K Morris; R Riley; M J Teune; K S Khan
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 6.531

2.  High birth weight and perinatal mortality among siblings: A register based study in Norway, 1967-2011.

Authors:  Petter Kristensen; Katherine M Keyes; Ezra Susser; Karina Corbett; Ingrid Sivesind Mehlum; Lorentz M Irgens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Deaths and end-of-life decisions differed between neonatal and paediatric intensive care units at the same children's hospital.

Authors:  Maartje C Snoep; Nicolaas J G Jansen; Floris Groenendaal
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.299

4.  A population-based study of effect of multiple birth on infant mortality in Nigeria.

Authors:  Olalekan A Uthman; Mubashir B Uthman; Ismail Yahaya
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Assessing fetal growth impairments based on family data as a tool for identifying high-risk babies. An example with neonatal mortality.

Authors:  Carsten B Pedersen; Yuelian Sun; Mogens Vestergaard; Jørn Olsen; Olga Basso
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Does caesarean delivery in the first pregnancy increase the risk for adverse outcome in the second? A registry-based cohort study on first and second singleton births in Norway.

Authors:  Solveig Bjellmo; Guro L Andersen; Sissel Hjelle; Kari Klungsøyr; Lone Krebs; Stian Lydersen; Pål Richard Romundstad; Torstein Vik
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.