M Gulmez1, A Guven. 1. Department of Food Hygiene and Technology, Faculty of Veterinary, University of Kafkas, Kars, Turkey. mgulmez@hotmail.com
Abstract
AIMS: To compare microbiological safety of yogurt, kefir and different combinations of yogurt and kefir samples by using three foodborne pathogenic strains (Escherichia coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes 4b and Yersinia enterocolitica O3) as indicators. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fresh yogurt and kefir drinks were added to pasteurized milk at a 5% rate either separately or together, and then incubated at different temperatures (43 degrees C for yogurt and 30 degrees C for kefir), depending on appropriate growth temperature of their starter microflora. While traditional yogurt was found to be the least suppressive on the three pathogenic micro-organisms, samples obtained from two subsequent fermentation process (samples fermented at 43 degrees C for 3 h and at 30 degrees C for 21 h) were more suppressive than that of traditional kefir. There was no significant survival difference between E. coli O157:H7 and L. monocytogenes 4b in samples tested (P > 0.05), but Y. enterocolitica O3 was more susceptible than other two test strains (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The microbiological safety of the dairy product fermented at two consecutive periods was superior than that of traditional yogurt or kefir alone. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: These experiments may mimic what happens when yogurt and kefir starter micro-organisms are combined in a milk fermentation process with different time and temperature periods.
AIMS: To compare microbiological safety of yogurt, kefir and different combinations of yogurt and kefir samples by using three foodborne pathogenic strains (Escherichia coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes 4b and Yersinia enterocolitica O3) as indicators. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fresh yogurt and kefir drinks were added to pasteurized milk at a 5% rate either separately or together, and then incubated at different temperatures (43 degrees C for yogurt and 30 degrees C for kefir), depending on appropriate growth temperature of their starter microflora. While traditional yogurt was found to be the least suppressive on the three pathogenic micro-organisms, samples obtained from two subsequent fermentation process (samples fermented at 43 degrees C for 3 h and at 30 degrees C for 21 h) were more suppressive than that of traditional kefir. There was no significant survival difference between E. coli O157:H7 and L. monocytogenes 4b in samples tested (P > 0.05), but Y. enterocolitica O3 was more susceptible than other two test strains (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The microbiological safety of the dairy product fermented at two consecutive periods was superior than that of traditional yogurt or kefir alone. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: These experiments may mimic what happens when yogurt and kefir starter micro-organisms are combined in a milk fermentation process with different time and temperature periods.