J E Kim1, D G Kim, S H Paek, H-W Jung. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The authors present a retrospective analysis of 308 computed tomography (CT)-guided stereotactic biopsies in 300 patients in order to evaluate the reliability and efficacy of the stereotactic biopsy for intracranial lesions. METHOD: All patients were suffering from undetermined intracranial lesions and treated at Seoul National University Hospital between January 1993 and December 1999. Age ranged from three to 79 years (mean 41); the male to female ratio was 180:120. All patients underwent CT-guided stereotactic biopsy for the histological verification and/or evacuation of the cyst using Riechert-Mundinger stereotactic system. FINDINGS: Histological diagnosis was made in 275 patients (diagnostic yield 91.7%). Diagnostic yield was better in group with frozen section examination during the stereotactic procedure than the group without it (p=0.01). Neoplastic lesions were more likely to be diagnosed in stereotactic biopsy than non-neoplastic lesions (p=0.02). Among 30 patients who underwent craniotomy after the stereotactic biopsy, the histological diagnoses after the craniotomy were identical to those of the stereotactic biopsy in 29 patients (diagnostic accuracy 96.7%). Two patients died within seven days after the stereotactic biopsy (mortality 0.6%). The postoperative new neurological deficit or aggravation of the neurological status was found in 19 patients, including transient cases of seven patients (permanent morbidity rate 3.9%). Histologically malignant gliomas and deeply-located lesions were the significant risk factors for the development of complications. In 148 cases, histological diagnosis of the stereotactic biopsy was different from the preoperative clinical diagnosis. Among these cases, the treatment plan was changed after stereotactic biopsy in 81 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic biopsy for intracranial lesions is a reliable and relatively safe procedure. It is also a very efficacious method especially in patients who need histological confirmation for the treatment.
BACKGROUND: The authors present a retrospective analysis of 308 computed tomography (CT)-guided stereotactic biopsies in 300 patients in order to evaluate the reliability and efficacy of the stereotactic biopsy for intracranial lesions. METHOD: All patients were suffering from undetermined intracranial lesions and treated at Seoul National University Hospital between January 1993 and December 1999. Age ranged from three to 79 years (mean 41); the male to female ratio was 180:120. All patients underwent CT-guided stereotactic biopsy for the histological verification and/or evacuation of the cyst using Riechert-Mundinger stereotactic system. FINDINGS: Histological diagnosis was made in 275 patients (diagnostic yield 91.7%). Diagnostic yield was better in group with frozen section examination during the stereotactic procedure than the group without it (p=0.01). Neoplastic lesions were more likely to be diagnosed in stereotactic biopsy than non-neoplastic lesions (p=0.02). Among 30 patients who underwent craniotomy after the stereotactic biopsy, the histological diagnoses after the craniotomy were identical to those of the stereotactic biopsy in 29 patients (diagnostic accuracy 96.7%). Two patients died within seven days after the stereotactic biopsy (mortality 0.6%). The postoperative new neurological deficit or aggravation of the neurological status was found in 19 patients, including transient cases of seven patients (permanent morbidity rate 3.9%). Histologically malignant gliomas and deeply-located lesions were the significant risk factors for the development of complications. In 148 cases, histological diagnosis of the stereotactic biopsy was different from the preoperative clinical diagnosis. Among these cases, the treatment plan was changed after stereotactic biopsy in 81 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic biopsy for intracranial lesions is a reliable and relatively safe procedure. It is also a very efficacious method especially in patients who need histological confirmation for the treatment.
Authors: Michail Plotkin; C Blechschmidt; G Auf; F Nyuyki; L Geworski; T Denecke; W Brenner; F Stockhammer Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-06-03 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Yi Lu; Cecil Yeung; Alireza Radmanesh; Robert Wiemann; Peter M Black; Alexandra J Golby Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Shota Tanaka; Fredric B Meyer; Jan C Buckner; Joon H Uhm; Elizabeth S Yan; Ian F Parney Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2012-08-09 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Ruben Dammers; Joost W Schouten; Iain K Haitsma; Arnaud J P E Vincent; Johan M Kros; Clemens M F Dirven Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2010-08-01 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Neda Haj-Hosseini; Johan C O Richter; Peter Milos; Martin Hallbeck; Karin Wårdell Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2018-04-20 Impact factor: 3.732