INTRODUCTION: Fibreoptic bronchoscopy is currently undertaken by the majority of respiratory physicians, but under varying conditions. Though complications are rare the tolerance of this examination is sometimes poor, particularly when it is performed under local anaesthesia. The undesirable effects may reduce the value of the examination as well as causing discomfort for the patient. METHODS: A prospective study of the tolerance of the endoscopic examination was made on 100 consecutive patients by self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: There were no major and 7 minor complications (7%). 45% of the patients were anxious but the experience of the operator tended to reassure them (p=0.07). 30% of the patients reported some pain, which tended to be exacerbated by anxiety (44% vs 18%, p=0.008) and the supine position (57% vs 43%, p=0.047). 37% of patients reported nausea, and 50% dyspnoea, without any significant predictive factor. 79% would agree to a repeat examination under the same conditions and 92% said that they had received information appropriate to the examination undergone. CONCLUSION: The tolerance of fibreoptic bronchoscopy under local anaesthesia is poor and perhaps overestimated by respiratory physicians. Patient information is essential. A national enquiry could lead to the standardisation of techniques.
INTRODUCTION: Fibreoptic bronchoscopy is currently undertaken by the majority of respiratory physicians, but under varying conditions. Though complications are rare the tolerance of this examination is sometimes poor, particularly when it is performed under local anaesthesia. The undesirable effects may reduce the value of the examination as well as causing discomfort for the patient. METHODS: A prospective study of the tolerance of the endoscopic examination was made on 100 consecutive patients by self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: There were no major and 7 minor complications (7%). 45% of the patients were anxious but the experience of the operator tended to reassure them (p=0.07). 30% of the patients reported some pain, which tended to be exacerbated by anxiety (44% vs 18%, p=0.008) and the supine position (57% vs 43%, p=0.047). 37% of patients reported nausea, and 50% dyspnoea, without any significant predictive factor. 79% would agree to a repeat examination under the same conditions and 92% said that they had received information appropriate to the examination undergone. CONCLUSION: The tolerance of fibreoptic bronchoscopy under local anaesthesia is poor and perhaps overestimated by respiratory physicians. Patient information is essential. A national enquiry could lead to the standardisation of techniques.