Literature DB >> 12909382

Quality of CPR with three different ventilation:compression ratios.

E Dorph1, L Wik, T A Strømme, M Eriksen, P A Steen.   

Abstract

Current adult basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines recommend a 2:15 ventilation:compression ratio, while the optimal ratio is unknown. This study was designed to compare arterial and mixed venous blood gas changes and cerebral circulation and oxygen delivery with ventilation:compression ratios of 2:15, 2:50 and 5:50 in a model of basic CPR. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) was induced in 12 anaesthetised pigs, and satisfactory recordings were obtained from 9 of them. A non-intervention interval of 3 min was followed by CPR with pauses in compressions for ventilation with 17% oxygen and 4% carbon dioxide in a randomised, cross-over design with each method being used for 5 min. Pulmonary gas exchange was clearly superior with a ventilation:compression ratio of 2:15. While the arterial oxygen saturation stayed above 80% throughout CPR for 2:15, it dropped below 40% during part of the ventilation:compression cycle for both the other two ratios. On the other hand, the ratio 2:50 produced 30% more chest compressions per minute than either of the two other methods. This resulted in a mean carotid flow that was significantly higher with the ratio of 2:50 than with 5:50 while 2:15 was not significantly different from either. The mean cerebrocortical microcirculation was approximately 37% of pre-VF levels during compression cycles alone with no significant differences between the methods. The oxygen delivery to the brain was higher for the ratio of 2:15 than for either 5:50 or 2:50. In parallel the central venous oxygenation, which gives some indication of tissue oxygenation, was higher for the ratio of 2:15 than for both 5:50 and 2:50. As the compressions were done with a mechanical device with only 2-3 s pauses per ventilation, the data cannot be extrapolated to laypersons who have great variations in quality of CPR. However, it might seem reasonable to suggest that basic CPR by professionals should continue with ratio of 2:15 at present if it can be shown that similar brief pauses for ventilation can be achieved in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12909382     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00125-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  5 in total

1.  [Decreased inspiratory time during ventilation of an unprotected airway. Effect on stomach inflation and lung ventilation in a bench model].

Authors:  A von Goedecke; K Bowden; C Keller; W G Voelckel; H-C Jeske; V Wenzel
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  ["Topless" cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Fashion or science?].

Authors:  K Markstaller; B Eberle; W F Dick
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  2005 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Part 2: Adult basic life support.

Authors: 
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.262

4.  European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 2. Adult basic life support and use of automated external defibrillators.

Authors:  Rudolph W Koster; Michael A Baubin; Leo L Bossaert; Antonio Caballero; Pascal Cassan; Maaret Castrén; Cristina Granja; Anthony J Handley; Koenraad G Monsieurs; Gavin D Perkins; Violetta Raffay; Claudio Sandroni
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.262

5.  Single Ventilation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Results in Better Neurological Outcomes in a Porcine Model of Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Yong Won Kim; Hyung Il Kim; Sung Oh Hwang; Yoon Seop Kim; Gyo Jin An; Kyoung Chul Cha
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.759

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.