Literature DB >> 12909068

A comparison of two invasive strategies in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: results of the Early or Late Intervention in unStable Angina (ELISA) pilot study. 2b/3a upstream therapy and acute coronary syndromes.

Arnoud W J van 't Hof1, Suzanna T de Vries, Jan-Henk E Dambrink, Kor Miedema, Harry Suryapranata, Jan C A Hoorntje, A T Marcel Gosselink, Felix Zijlstra, Menko-Jan de Boer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Only few studies specifically addressed the effect of timing of angiography and/or pre-treatment with a glycoprotein 2b/3a receptor blocker in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS) who undergo invasive treatment.
METHODS: In a 2-year period, 220 patients with non-ST elevation ACS, were randomized to early angiography without tirofiban pre-treatment (Early strategy) or to delayed angiography after 24-48h pre-treatment with tirofiban (Late strategy). The first 48h after admission, CKmb levels were measured and enzymatic infarct size (LDHQ(48)) was assessed by the area under the LDH release curve. When PCI was performed beyond 48h, CKmb was measured 6 and 12h afterwards.
RESULTS: Median time to angiography was 6 (Early) and 50 (Late) hours. PCI was performed in 130 patients (59%). In these patients, a patent (TIMI 2 or 3 flow) culprit vessel was more often present in the Late group compared to the Early group (66% vs 82% p=0.05). In patients with an elevated CKmb (n=96, 44%), LDHQ(48)was significantly lower in patients who underwent angiography after pre-treatment with tirofiban (629+/-503U/L (Early) vs 432+/-441U/L (Late), p=0.02). No difference in clinical outcome between the groups was observed at 30 days follow-up.
CONCLUSION: This pilot study showed that a strategy of delayed angiography with concomitant pre-treatment with tirofiban is associated with improved angiographic outcomes and less initial enzyme release, compared to a strategy of immediate angiography without 2b/3a inhibitor pre-treatment. The use of an end point parameter, which assess total enzyme release over a given period of time, might be of special value in patients with non-ST elevation ACS, who undergo very early invasive treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12909068     DOI: 10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00259-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  21 in total

Review 1.  Routine invasive versus conservative management in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Peter R Sinnaeve
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Time for a new paradigm shift in myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Emre K Aslanger; H Pendell Meyers; Stephen W Smith
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.596

3.  Prime time for the sweet spot in timing of coronary invasive approach in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Eliano P Navarese; Bernhard Wernly; Michael Lichtenauer; Martino Pepe; Wojciech Wanha; Giuseppe Ferrante; Lara Frediani; Verena Veulemans; Tobias Zeus; Ralf Westenfeld; Christian Jung; Paul A Gurbel
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Timing of invasive strategy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome and effect on clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Vladan Vukcevic; Goran Stankovic
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Routine upstream versus selective down stream use of tirofiban in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction patients scheduled for early invasive therapy; a randomized comparison.

Authors:  Saman Rasoul; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Menko Jan de Boer; Jan Henk E Dambrink; Harry Suryapranata; Jan C A Hoorntje; A T Marcel Gosselink; Arnoud W J van 't Hof
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Circumflex artery-related acute myocardial infarction: limited ECG abnormalities but poor outcome.

Authors:  S Rasoul; M J de Boer; H Suryapranata; J C A Hoorntje; A T M Gosselink; F Zijlstra; J P Ottervanger; J H E Dambrink; A W J van 't Hof
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  [Timing of invasive treatment in NSTEMI: as fast as in STEMI?].

Authors:  A Jobs; I Eitel; S Desch
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.443

8.  Very early invasive angiography versus standard of care in higher-risk non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: study protocol for the prospective multicentre randomised controlled RAPID N-STEMI trial.

Authors:  Thomas A Kite; Amerjeet S Banning; Andrew Ladwiniec; Chris P Gale; John P Greenwood; Miles Dalby; Rachel Hobson; Shaun Barber; Emma Parker; Colin Berry; Marcus D Flather; Nick Curzen; Adrian P Banning; Gerry P McCann; Anthony H Gershlick
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 3.006

9.  Early Invasive Strategy for Unstable Angina: a New Meta-Analysis of Old Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Olivia Manfrini; Beatrice Ricci; Ada Dormi; Paolo Emilio Puddu; Edina Cenko; Raffaele Bugiardini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Reducing time to angiography and hospital stay for patients with high-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: retrospective analysis of a paramedic-activated direct access pathway.

Authors:  S Koganti; N Patel; A Seraphim; T Kotecha; M Whitbread; R D Rakhit
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.