Literature DB >> 1290784

Demineralized perforated bone implants in craniofacial surgery.

K E Salyer1, E Gendler, J L Menendez, T R Simon, K M Kelly, J Bardach.   

Abstract

Between July 1990 and September 1991, demineralized perforated allogeneic bone implants (Pacific Coast Tissue Bank, Los Angeles, CA) were placed in 72 patients. Because many patients received more than one implant, a total of 248 implants were used in 80 procedures. The technology of processing demineralized bone implants is described in detail. All patients were operated on by one surgeon (K.E.S.) at the Humana Craniofacial Institute in Dallas, Texas. Forty-one patients had craniofacial deformities, 16 had secondary deformities following cleft lip and palate repair, 8 had bony defects following removal of tumors, and 10 had various skeletal deformities following trauma. Of the 72 patients, 6 had two surgical procedures during which additional implants were inserted. Implants placed in the cranial vault and the maxillary complex, including alveolar grafts, were inlay grafts, whereas implants placed in the orbital, nasal, paranasal, temporal, and malar areas were onlay grafts used for contouring, augmentation, or both. Complications were limited to delayed wound healing in 6 patients. According to our observations, demineralized perforated bone implants represent an encouraging alternative to autogenous bone grafting. Further clinical and experimental studies are necessary to obtain more information about this material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1290784     DOI: 10.1097/00001665-199209000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  8 in total

1.  Bone grafts in craniofacial surgery.

Authors:  Mohammed E Elsalanty; David G Genecov
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2009-10

Review 2.  [Osteoinduction and -reparation].

Authors:  N R Kübler
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  1997-02

3.  Regeneration of a Pediatric Alveolar Cleft Model Using Three-Dimensionally Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds and Osteogenic Agents: Comparison of Dipyridamole and rhBMP-2.

Authors:  Christopher D Lopez; Paulo G Coelho; Lukasz Witek; Andrea Torroni; Michael I Greenberg; Dean L Cuadrado; Audrey M Guarino; Jonathan M Bekisz; Bruce N Cronstein; Roberto L Flores
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Surgical treatment of frontal sinus fracture sequelae with methyl methacrylate prosthesis.

Authors:  Lucas Cavalieri-Pereira; Adriano Assis; Sergio Olate; Luciana Asprino; Marcio de Moraes
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2013-11-01

5.  Biomaterials for craniofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  Andreas Neumann; Kevin Kevenhoerster
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-03-10

Review 6.  Demineralized bone matrix in bone repair: history and use.

Authors:  Elliott Gruskin; Bruce A Doll; F William Futrell; John P Schmitz; Jeffrey O Hollinger
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 15.470

7.  Skeletal facial balance and harmony in the cleft patient: Principles and techniques in orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Kenneth E Salyer; Haisong Xu; Jason E Portnof; Akira Yamada; David K Chong; Edward R Genecov
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2009-10

Review 8.  A Narrative Review of Cell-Based Approaches for Cranial Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Maria I Falguera Uceda; Silvia Sánchez-Casanova; Clara Escudero-Duch; Nuria Vilaboa
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 6.321

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.