Literature DB >> 12907590

Understanding creaminess perception of dairy products using free-choice profiling and genetic responsivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil.

Sarah V Kirkmeyer1, Beverly J Tepper.   

Abstract

Flavor and texture contribute to the perception of creaminess in dairy products, but the nature of this interaction is not well understood. Previous studies on the genetic ability to perceive the bitter compound 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) reveal the existence of individual differences in creaminess perception. The objective of the present study was to use PROP-classified subjects to gain insight into this individual variation to better understand the cues for creaminess in dairy products, and to ascertain the contributions of flavor and texture to the integrated perception of creaminess. Ten nontasters and 10 supertasters of PROP participated in the study. Subjects evaluated nine commercial dairy products using Free-Choice Profiling (FCP), a type of descriptive analysis that allows subjects to rate products on individual lists of descriptors. Generalized Procrustes Analysis was used to develop separate consensus spaces for nontasters and supertasters. The models for both groups accounted for approximately 54% of the variance in the data and were resolved in two dimensions (a dairy flavor/texture axis and a sweet-sour continuum). The products were arranged in a similar pattern along the dimensions in both models. However, nontasters used a limited number of simple terms (sour, sweet, milky and mouthcoating) to describe the products, whereas supertasters used a more complex vocabulary (rich, buttery, creamy, light, grainy, gritty and sandy). The model for nontasters gave equal weight to the sweet-sour and dairy flavor/texture dimensions (28 and 26% variance, respectively); whereas, the model for supertasters relied more heavily on the dairy flavor/texture dimension (34% variance), and less so on the sweet-sour dimension (20% variance). These data suggest that the overall impression of creaminess was similar for nontasters and supertasters, but the cues the two groups used to judge creaminess differed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12907590     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/28.6.527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  22 in total

Review 1.  Is there a fatty acid taste?

Authors:  Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.848

2.  The examination of fatty acid taste with edible strips.

Authors:  Sahbina Ebba; Ray A Abarintos; Dae G Kim; Melissa Tiyouh; Judith C Stull; Ankur Movalia; Gregory Smutzer
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-04-12

3.  Relationships of PROP Taste Phenotype, Taste Receptor Genotype, and Oral Nicotine Replacement Use.

Authors:  Karen Ahijevych; Beverly J Tepper; Margaret C Graham; Christopher Holloman; William A Matcham
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Reliability of a common solution-based taste perception test: implications for validity and a briefer test.

Authors:  S M Coulon; A C Miller; J M Reed; C K Martin
Journal:  Eat Behav       Date:  2011-10-01

5.  Measures of individual differences in taste and creaminess perception.

Authors:  Juyun Lim; Lenka Urban; Barry G Green
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Wine Expertise Predicts Taste Phenotype.

Authors:  John E Hayes; Gary J Pickering
Journal:  Am J Enol Vitic       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.253

7.  Associations between orosensory perception of oleic acid, the common single nucleotide polymorphisms (rs1761667 and rs1527483) in the CD36 gene, and 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) tasting.

Authors:  Melania Melis; Giorgia Sollai; Patrizia Muroni; Roberto Crnjar; Iole Tomassini Barbarossa
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Sensory-Directed Identification of Creaminess-Enhancing Semi-Volatile Lactones in Crumb Chocolate.

Authors:  Julia Samfaß; Timo D Stark; Thomas F Hofmann
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-06-25

9.  The gustin (CA6) gene polymorphism, rs2274333 (A/G), as a mechanistic link between PROP tasting and fungiform taste papilla density and maintenance.

Authors:  Melania Melis; Elena Atzori; Stefano Cabras; Andrea Zonza; Carla Calò; Patrizia Muroni; Mariella Nieddu; Alessandra Padiglia; Valeria Sogos; Beverly J Tepper; Iole Tomassini Barbarossa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Genetic sensitivity to the bitter taste of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and its association with physiological mechanisms controlling body mass index (BMI).

Authors:  Beverly J Tepper; Sebastiano Banni; Melania Melis; Roberto Crnjar; Iole Tomassini Barbarossa
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.