Literature DB >> 12907180

Age and responding-hand related changes in performance of neurologically normal subjects on the line-bisection and chimeric-faces tasks.

Christina V Failla1, Dianne M Sheppard, John L Bradshaw.   

Abstract

This study investigated age and responding-hand (left, right, and bimanual) related changes in visuospatial attention. Two tasks were completed by 107 neurologically normal right-handed subjects ranging in age from 5 to 70 years and distributed across four age groups. Task-specific differences between groups were apparent. In the line-bisection task, the younger and older groups displayed symmetrical neglect while the young and middle groups displayed pseudoneglect. In the chimeric-faces task the leftward bias was less pronounced in the older group and more susceptible to responding-hand effects in the middle and older groups. Whilst results, especially those of the bimanual method, provided strong support for an activation model, they imposed an age limitation on its appropriateness as an explanation for performance on the chimeric-faces task. Results are discussed as reflecting changes in the corpus callosum and right hemisphere.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12907180     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2626(03)00181-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  28 in total

1.  Static versus dynamic judgments of spatial extent.

Authors:  Marc Hurwitz; Derick Valadao; James Danckert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The left-side bias is not unique to own-race face processing.

Authors:  Chenglin Li; Zhiguo Wang; Hui Bao; Jianping Wang; Shuang Chen; Xiaohua Cao
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Asymmetrical effects of adaptation to left- and right-shifting prisms depends on pre-existing attentional biases.

Authors:  Kelly M Goedert; Andrew Leblanc; Sen-Wei Tsai; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 2.892

4.  Age-related differences in distractor interference on line bisection.

Authors:  Sergio Chieffi; Alessandro Iavarone; Leonardo Iaccarino; Marco La Marra; Giovanni Messina; Vincenzo De Luca; Marcellino Monda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Spatial bias and right hemisphere function: sex-specific changes with aging.

Authors:  Peii Chen; Kelly M Goedert; Elizabeth Murray; Karen Kelly; Shpresa Ahmeti; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.892

6.  Corpus Callosum Maturation and Line Bisection Performance in Healthy Children.

Authors:  Dalin T Pulsipher; Michael Seidenberg; Bruce P Hermann
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.978

7.  Developmental changes in neural lateralization for visual-spatial function: Evidence from a line-bisection task.

Authors:  Katrina Ferrara; Anna Seydell-Greenwald; Catherine E Chambers; Elissa L Newport; Barbara Landau
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2021-12-27

8.  Hemispheric asymmetry and callosal integration of visuospatial attention in schizophrenia: a tachistoscopic line bisection study.

Authors:  Mark E McCourt; Marina Shpaner; Daniel C Javitt; John J Foxe
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 9.  Representational pseudoneglect: a review.

Authors:  Joanna L Brooks; Sergio Della Sala; Stephen Darling
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 7.444

10.  Left hand dominance affects supra-second time processing.

Authors:  Carmelo Mario Vicario; Sonia Bonní; Giacomo Koch
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.