Literature DB >> 12907097

Cervical cytology screening practices among obstetrician-gynecologists.

Kenneth L Noller1, Barbara Bettes, Stanley Zinberg, Jay Schulkin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the current cervical cytology screening practices of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Fellows, to establish a baseline for tracking future changes in practice.
METHODS: Questionnaires were mailed to a random sample of ACOG Fellows (n = 599) and to a group of Fellows who have regularly participated in past ACOG surveys (n = 409). The questionnaires asked about current cytology screening and evaluation practices and presented clinical practice vignettes with additional questions. Descriptive statistical methods were used to evaluate the responses.
RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned by 651 physicians (64.6%); 624 were complete. More than 94% of the respondents start cytology testing at age 18 years. Almost three fourths (74.2%) continue screening indefinitely. More than 80% use a liquid-based method of collection. Almost two thirds (65.1%) order human papillomavirus testing occasionally, usually (81.9%) for reports of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS). Most Fellows in the sample perform colposcopy for an ASCUS result. Reports of atypical glandular cells resulted in variable approaches to further evaluation. Patient age and history were important variables for all test reports. Legal concerns were mentioned as important determinants of practice patterns.
CONCLUSION: In this sample of ACOG Fellows, most perform cervical cytology and evaluate abnormal results in accord with guidelines in place before the recommended changes in screening and evaluation were published in 2003.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12907097     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00565-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  10 in total

Review 1.  Impact of clinical practice guidelines on the clinical microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  Peter H Gilligan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Performance of implementing guideline-driven cervical cancer screening measures in an inner-city hospital system.

Authors:  Daryl L Wieland; Laura L Reimers; Eijean Wu; Lisa M Nathan; Tammy Gruenberg; Maria Abadi; Mark H Einstein
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing for normal cervical cytology in low-risk women aged 30-65 years by family physicians.

Authors:  Maria Syl D de la Cruz; Alisa P Young; Mack T Ruffin
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.657

Review 4.  Early cervical neoplasia: advances in screening and treatment modalities.

Authors:  Brent Tierney; Shannon N Westin; Matthew P Schlumbrecht; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Clin Adv Hematol Oncol       Date:  2010-08

5.  Association between physician specialty and uptake of new medical technologies: HPV tests in Florida Medicaid.

Authors:  Rebecca Anhang Price
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Variations in practice guideline adherence for abnormal cervical cytology in a county healthcare system.

Authors:  Rita Singhal; Lisa V Rubenstein; Mingming Wang; Martin L Lee; Anwar Raza; Christine H Holschneider
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Cost is a barrier to widespread use of liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer screening in Korea.

Authors:  Hyun Hoon Chung; Jae Weon Kim; Soon-Beom Kang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Physicians' intentions to change pap smear frequency following human papillomavirus vaccination.

Authors:  K L Bruder; K L Downes; T L Malo; A R Giuliano; D A Salmon; S T Vadaparampil
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 1.814

9.  Market survey predictions on the future of US Pap testing.

Authors:  R Marshall Austin; Barbara Benstein; Joel Bentz; Sandra Bigner; Gregory G Freund; Gregory La Rocco; Ibrahim Ramzy; Lynnette Savaloja; Vinod B Shidham
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 2.091

10.  Cervical HPV infection and neoplasia in a large population-based prospective study: the Manchester cohort.

Authors:  J Peto; C Gilham; J Deacon; C Taylor; C Evans; W Binns; M Haywood; N Elanko; D Coleman; R Yule; M Desai
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.