Literature DB >> 12906817

The minus end in sight.

Alexander Dammermann1, Arshad Desai, Karen Oegema.   

Abstract

Microtubules are intrinsically polar structures. A consequence of this polarity is that the two ends of the microtubule polymer exhibit different properties. The more dynamic plus ends and the mechanisms that regulate their behavior have been the focus of much recent attention. Here, we concentrate on the dynamics and regulation of minus ends, which play distinct but equally critical roles in microtubule function. In the first part of this review, we compare the in vitro and in vivo behavior of microtubules from a minus end perspective. This comparison suggests that cells possess conserved mechanisms to specifically inhibit minus end polymerization, and perhaps also to actively promote depolymerization. In the second part, we focus on the spatial positioning of minus ends, which is achieved by localized microtubule nucleation, minus end capping and minus end anchoring as well as by motor-dependent sorting. These mechanisms are used in different biological contexts to generate the diversity of organized microtubule arrays in cells.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12906817     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00530-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  57 in total

1.  Genome size and structure determine efficiency of postinternalization steps and gene transfer of capsid-modified adenovirus vectors in a cell-type-specific manner.

Authors:  Dmitry M Shayakhmetov; Zong-Yi Li; Anuj Gaggar; Helen Gharwan; Vladimir Ternovoi; Volker Sandig; André Lieber
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Analysis of Dictyostelium TACC reveals differential interactions with CP224 and unusual dynamics of Dictyostelium microtubules.

Authors:  Matthias Samereier; Otto Baumann; Irene Meyer; Ralph Gräf
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 3.  Regulation of cell migration by dynamic microtubules.

Authors:  Irina Kaverina; Anne Straube
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 7.727

4.  A complex of two centrosomal proteins, CAP350 and FOP, cooperates with EB1 in microtubule anchoring.

Authors:  Xiumin Yan; Robert Habedanck; Erich A Nigg
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 4.138

5.  Compartment volume influences microtubule dynamic instability: a model study.

Authors:  Albertas Janulevicius; Jaap van Pelt; Arjen van Ooyen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Microtubule stability studied by three-dimensional molecular theory of solvation.

Authors:  Piotr Drabik; Sergey Gusarov; Andriy Kovalenko
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Microtubule plus-end tracking by CLIP-170 requires EB1.

Authors:  Ram Dixit; Brian Barnett; Jacob E Lazarus; Mariko Tokito; Yale E Goldman; Erika L F Holzbaur
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  GAS41 amplification results in overexpression of a new spindle pole protein.

Authors:  Jana Schmitt; Ulrike Fischer; Sabrina Heisel; Hilmar Strickfaden; Christina Backes; Alessia Ruggieri; Andreas Keller; Paul Chang; Eckart Meese
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 5.006

9.  Dm nxf1/sbr gene affects the formation of meiotic spindle in female Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Elena V Golubkova; Ekaterina G Markova; Anton V Markov; Elina O Avanesyan; Seppo Nokkala; Ludmila A Mamon
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 10.  Microtubule-based force generation.

Authors:  Ian A Kent; Tanmay P Lele
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2016-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.