OBJECTIVE: To assess whether in screening for trisomy 21 by nuchal translucency (NT) the delta or the multiples of the median (MoM) approach is the most appropriate method for calculating accurate individual patient-specific risks. METHODS: Data on fetal NT and crown-rump length from 128,030 unaffected and 428 trisomy 21 pregnancies, measured by sonographers who had obtained The Fetal Medicine Foundation Certificate of Competence in the 11-14-Week Scan, were used. We examined first, if the distribution of NT MoM and log(10)(NT MoM) was Gaussian; second, if the standard deviation of the distributions did not change with gestation; and third, if the median MoM in the affected population was a constant proportion of the median for unaffected pregnancies. All of these features are required to underpin the MoM approach. NT distributions and those of delta-NT were also analyzed. A non-parametric kernel density method was then used to assess the validity of both methods. Errors in the estimation of individual patient-specific risks using the MoM approach were assessed. RESULTS: In the unaffected pregnancies, the distributions of NT MoM and log(10)(NT MoM) were not Gaussian and the standard deviation of log(10)(NT MoM) decreased with gestation. In the trisomy 21 pregnancies, the median NT MoM decreased significantly with gestation, whereas the median delta-NT did not change with gestation. The non-parametric density approach showed that contours of constant likelihood ratio were parallel to the gestational age-dependent median NT values, thus supporting the delta-NT approach. The NT MoM approach resulted in women being given an overestimate of risk for trisomy at 11 weeks and a considerable underestimate of risk at 13 weeks. CONCLUSION: In the calculation of risk for trisomy 21 by NT the NT MoM approach is inaccurate and inappropriate because the underlying assumptions are not valid. In contrast, the delta-NT approach gives accurate estimates of risks. Copyright 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether in screening for trisomy 21 by nuchal translucency (NT) the delta or the multiples of the median (MoM) approach is the most appropriate method for calculating accurate individual patient-specific risks. METHODS: Data on fetal NT and crown-rump length from 128,030 unaffected and 428 trisomy 21 pregnancies, measured by sonographers who had obtained The Fetal Medicine Foundation Certificate of Competence in the 11-14-Week Scan, were used. We examined first, if the distribution of NT MoM and log(10)(NT MoM) was Gaussian; second, if the standard deviation of the distributions did not change with gestation; and third, if the median MoM in the affected population was a constant proportion of the median for unaffected pregnancies. All of these features are required to underpin the MoM approach. NT distributions and those of delta-NT were also analyzed. A non-parametric kernel density method was then used to assess the validity of both methods. Errors in the estimation of individual patient-specific risks using the MoM approach were assessed. RESULTS: In the unaffected pregnancies, the distributions of NT MoM and log(10)(NT MoM) were not Gaussian and the standard deviation of log(10)(NT MoM) decreased with gestation. In the trisomy 21 pregnancies, the median NT MoM decreased significantly with gestation, whereas the median delta-NT did not change with gestation. The non-parametric density approach showed that contours of constant likelihood ratio were parallel to the gestational age-dependent median NT values, thus supporting the delta-NT approach. The NT MoM approach resulted in women being given an overestimate of risk for trisomy at 11 weeks and a considerable underestimate of risk at 13 weeks. CONCLUSION: In the calculation of risk for trisomy 21 by NT the NT MoM approach is inaccurate and inappropriate because the underlying assumptions are not valid. In contrast, the delta-NT approach gives accurate estimates of risks. Copyright 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.