Literature DB >> 12904791

Bottlenose dolphins perceive object features through echolocation.

Heidi E Harley1, Erika A Putman, Herbert L Roitblat.   

Abstract

How organisms (including people) recognize distant objects is a fundamental question. The correspondence between object characteristics (distal stimuli), like visual shape, and sensory characteristics (proximal stimuli), like retinal projection, is ambiguous. The view that sensory systems are 'designed' to 'pick up' ecologically useful information is vague about how such mechanisms might work. In echolocating dolphins, which are studied as models for object recognition sonar systems, the correspondence between echo characteristics and object characteristics is less clear. Many cognitive scientists assume that object characteristics are extracted from proximal stimuli, but evidence for this remains ambiguous. For example, a dolphin may store 'sound templates' in its brain and identify whole objects by listening for a particular sound. Alternatively, a dolphin's brain may contain algorithms, derived through natural endowments or experience or both, which allow it to identify object characteristics based on sounds. The standard method used to address this question in many species is indirect and has led to equivocal results with dolphins. Here we outline an appropriate method and test it to show that dolphins extract object characteristics directly from echoes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12904791     DOI: 10.1038/nature01846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  16 in total

1.  Bottlenose dolphins can use learned vocal labels to address each other.

Authors:  Stephanie L King; Vincent M Janik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  If at first you don't succeed... Studies of ontogeny shed light on the cognitive demands of habitual tool use.

Authors:  E J M Meulman; A M Seed; J Mann
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The acuity of echolocation: Spatial resolution in the sighted compared to expert performance.

Authors:  Santani Teng; David Whitney
Journal:  J Vis Impair Blind       Date:  2011-01

Review 4.  Non-visual environmental imaging and object detection through active electrolocation in weakly electric fish.

Authors:  G von der Emde
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-01-28       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Identity concept formation during visual multiple-choice matching in a harbor seal (Phoca vitulina).

Authors:  Björn Mauck; Guido Dehnhardt
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Equivalence classification, learning by exclusion, and long-term memory in pinnipeds: cognitive mechanisms demonstrated through research with subjects under human care and in the field.

Authors:  Kristy L Biolsi; Kevin L Woo
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 2.899

7.  Classification of natural textures in echolocation.

Authors:  Jan-Eric Grunwald; Sven Schörnich; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Infants' representations of same and different in match- and non-match-to-sample.

Authors:  Jean-Rémy Hochmann; Shilpa Mody; Susan Carey
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Evidence for spatial representation of object shape by echolocating bats (Eptesicus fuscus).

Authors:  Caroline M Delong; Rebecca Bragg; James A Simmons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Active electrolocation of polarized objects by a pulse-discharging electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii.

Authors:  Alexis Avril; Christian Graff
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.