Literature DB >> 12904609

Needlescopic cholecystectomy: prospective study of 150 patients.

E C S Lai1, M Fok, A S H Chan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of cholecystectomy using miniaturised instruments of 3 mm or less in diameter.
DESIGN: Prospective study on patients with gallstones, with or without related complications.
SETTING: Private hospital, Hong Kong. PATIENTS: From September 1997 to September 2002, 150 of the 180 consecutive patients managed were included in the present study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All patients were operated on with a standard four-port technique. Mini-laparoscopes of different sizes were used throughout the study period, which included 2-mm (n=33) fibre-optic laparoscope, and 2.5-mm (n=61) and 3-mm (n=56) laparoscopes of Hopkins rod lens system. The cystic duct and artery were secured either by extracorporeal ties or 10-mm clips passed through the umbilicus. The time taken from dissection to division of the cystic duct and artery, and to complete the operation were documented.
RESULTS: The operation was successfully completed with needlescopic instruments in 127 (85%) patients, even though patients with acute cholecystitis and history of common bile duct stones were included. Use of larger-diameter mini-laparoscopes decreased the time needed to divide the cystic duct and artery, to detach the gall bladder from the liver, and to complete the operation. There were no deaths. One minor bile duct injury developed secondary to extensive cauterisation of the gall bladder fossa.
CONCLUSION: Needlescopic cholecystectomy with minor technical modification can be completed within a duration comparable to standard laparoscopy at no increased risk for the great majority of patients with gallstones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12904609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hong Kong Med J        ISSN: 1024-2708            Impact factor:   2.227


  7 in total

1.  Reevaluation of needlescopic surgery.

Authors:  Nobumi Tagaya; Keiichi Kubota
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Twenty years after Erich Muhe: Persisting controversies with the gold standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kalpesh Jani; P S Rajan; K Sendhilkumar; C Palanivelu
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.407

3.  Needlescopic cholecystectomy: lessons learned in 10 years of experience.

Authors:  Morris E Franklin; Eduardo J Jaramillo; Jeffrey L Glass; Jorge M Treviño; Keenan R Berghoff
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Renaissance of Minilaparoscopy in the NOTES and single port era.

Authors:  Gustavo L Carvalho; Marcelo P Loureiro; Eduardo A Bonin
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Two-port mini laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S Sreenivas; Ravindra Singh Mohil; Gulshan Jit Singh; Jainendra K Arora; Vipul Kandwal; Jitendra Chouhan
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.407

6.  Simplified laparoscopic cholecystectomy with two incisions.

Authors:  Rafael Antoniazzi Abaid; Ivan Cecconello; Bruno Zilberstein
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun

7.  Is mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy any better than the gold standard?: A comparative study.

Authors:  Haris R Shaikh; Asad Abbas; Salik Aleem; Miqdad R Lakhani
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.