Literature DB >> 12904387

Monitoring of cytomegalovirus infection in solid-organ transplant recipients by an ultrasensitive plasma PCR assay.

Karine Hadaya1, Werner Wunderli, Christelle Deffernez, Pierre-Yves Martin, Gilles Mentha, Isabelle Binet, Luc Perrin, Laurent Kaiser.   

Abstract

Early and accurate monitoring of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in solid-organ transplant recipients is of major importance. We have assessed the potential benefit of an ultrasensitive plasma-based PCR assay for renal transplant recipients. The pp65 CMV antigen (pp65 Ag) assay using leukocytes was employed as a routine test for the monitoring of CMV in 23 transplant recipients. We compared the pp65 antigenemia with the CMV load quantified by an ultrasensitive PCR (US-PCR) with a limit of detection of 20 CMV DNA copies/ml of plasma. CMV infection was detected in 215 (67%) of 321 plasma samples by the US-PCR compared with 124 (39%) of 321 samples by the pp65 Ag assay. The US-PCR assay permitted the detection of CMV infection episodes following transplantation a median of 12 days earlier than the pp65 Ag assay. Moreover, during CMV infection episodes, DNA detection by the US-PCR was consistently positive, whereas false negative results were frequently observed with the pp65 Ag assay. We found a good correlation between the two assays, and the peak viral loads were significantly higher in patients with CMV-related complications (median, 5000 DNA copies/ml) than in those without symptoms (1160 DNA copies/ml) (P = 0.048). In addition, patients that did not require preemptive therapy based on the results of the pp65 assay had CMV loads significantly lower (median, 36 DNA copies/ml) than those that needed treatment (median, 4703 DNA copies/ml) (P < 0.001). These observations provided cutoff levels that could be applied in clinical practice. The ultrasensitive plasma-based PCR detected CMV infection episodes earlier and provided more consistent results than the pp65 Ag assay. This test could improve the monitoring of CMV infection or reactivation in renal transplant recipients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12904387      PMCID: PMC179769          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.8.3757-3764.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  34 in total

1.  Comparison of quantitative and qualitative PCR assays for cytomegalovirus DNA in plasma.

Authors:  A M Caliendo; R Schuurman; B Yen-Lieberman; S A Spector; J Andersen; R Manjiry; C Crumpacker; N S Lurain; A Erice
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in recipients of solid-organ transplants.

Authors:  C V Paya
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Application of viral-load kinetics to identify patients who develop cytomegalovirus disease after transplantation.

Authors:  V C Emery; C A Sabin; A V Cope; D Gor; A F Hassan-Walker; P D Griffiths
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-06-10       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Comparison of quantitative cytomegalovirus (CMV) PCR in plasma and CMV antigenemia assay: clinical utility of the prototype AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR test in transplant recipients.

Authors:  A M Caliendo; K St George; S Y Kao; J Allega; B H Tan; R LaFontaine; L Bui; C R Rinaldo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Cytomegalovirus in renal transplantation.

Authors:  Daniel C Brennan
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  Comparison of plasma polymerase chain reaction and pp65-antigenemia assay in the quantification of cytomegalovirus in liver and kidney transplant patients.

Authors:  H Piiparinen; K Höckerstedt; C Grönhagen-Riska; M Lappalainen; J Suni; I Lautenschlager
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.168

7.  Impact of prophylactic immediate posttransplant ganciclovir on development of transplant atherosclerosis: a post hoc analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  H A Valantine; S Z Gao; S G Menon; D G Renlund; S A Hunt; P Oyer; E B Stinson; B W Brown; T C Merigan; J S Schroeder
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Cytomegalovirus PP65 antigenemia monitoring as a guide for preemptive therapy: a cost effective strategy for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in adult liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  S Kusne; P Grossi; W Irish; K St George; C Rinaldo; J Rakela; J Fung
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1999-10-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 9.  Importance of CMV in the transplant population.

Authors:  R H Rubin
Journal:  Transpl Infect Dis       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.228

10.  Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA load predicts relapsing CMV infection after solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  I G Sia; J A Wilson; C M Groettum; M J Espy; T F Smith; C V Paya
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.226

View more
  9 in total

1.  Modelling and optimal control of immune response of renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  H T Banks; Shuhua Hu; Taesoo Jang; Hee-Dae Kwon
Journal:  J Biol Dyn       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.179

2.  Lack of evidence for systemic cytomegalovirus reactivation in maintenance hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  R U Pliquett; C Klein; T Grünewald; B R Ruf; J Beige
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  A Model for HCMV Infection in Immunosuppressed Patients.

Authors:  G M Kepler; H T Banks; M Davidian; E S Rosenberg
Journal:  Math Comput Model       Date:  2009-04

4.  Molecular Detection and Glycoprotein B (UL55) Genotyping of Cytomegalovirus among Sudanese Renal Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Hind Haidar Ahmed; Hisham N Altyab; Samar M Saeed; Wafaa Mohammed Abdalla; Alfadil Elobeid Omer
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 5.  Clinical utility of viral load in management of cytomegalovirus infection after solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Raymund R Razonable; Randall T Hayden
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Multicenter comparison of laboratory performance in cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus viral load testing using international standards.

Authors:  Jenna Rychert; Lara Danziger-Isakov; Belinda Yen-Lieberman; Gregory Storch; Richard Buller; Stewart C Sweet; Aneesh K Mehta; Jennifer A Cheeseman; Peter Heeger; Eric S Rosenberg; Jay A Fishman
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.863

7.  Recombinant luciferase-expressing human cytomegalovirus (CMV) for evaluation of CMV inhibitors.

Authors:  Ran He; Gordon Sandford; Gary S Hayward; William H Burns; Gary H Posner; Michael Forman; Ravit Arav-Boger
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 4.099

8.  Effect of ganciclovir for the treatment of severe cytomegalovirus-associated pneumonia in children without a specific immunocompromised state.

Authors:  Thanh Thi Mai Doan; Thuy Thi Bich Phung; Hung Viet Pham; Son Hong Pham; Liem Thanh Nguyen
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  Adenovirus, herpes simplex virus and cytomegalovirus infection in a lung transplant recipient.

Authors:  Sandhya Nagarakanti; Eliahu Bishburg; Anita Bapat
Journal:  IDCases       Date:  2018-02-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.