Literature DB >> 12903699

Use of a maternity support binder for relief of pregnancy-related back pain.

Catherine A Carr1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of a support binder for low back pain in pregnancy.
DESIGN: Pilot study, using a prospective, two-group design with repeated measures.
SETTING: Ambulatory maternity clinic in a tertiary care teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Women of at least 20 weeks gestation with low back pain, but no preexisting back or disc disease. Thirty women assigned to the intervention group and 10 to a comparison group.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants completed a pain assessment at pretest. Intervention participants received a maternity support binder to wear while awake for 2 weeks. At an appointment 2 weeks later, a posttest questionnaire and a taped interview were administered. The comparison group participants received the support binder after the second appointment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Back pain intensity, duration, and effect on daily activities were assessed using a pain in pregnancy questionnaire.
RESULTS: The intervention group had significant reduction in mean pain scores and effect of pain on daily activities, including family, house and yard, recreational, exercise, and sleep. Interaction of group by time was significant for change in pain and effect on family, house and yard, and exercise activities.
CONCLUSION: The use of a support binder for pregnancy-related low back pain is a promising intervention and was well-accepted by the participants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12903699     DOI: 10.1177/0884217503255196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs        ISSN: 0090-0311


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of the Modified Lumbar Pelvic Belt with the Current Belt on Low Back and Pelvic Pain in Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Zhaleh Heydari; Gholamreza Aminian; Akbar Biglarian; Maryam Shokrpour; Mohammad Ali Mardani
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2022-06-01

Review 2.  Lumbar supports for prevention and treatment of low back pain.

Authors:  I C D van Duijvenbode; P Jellema; M N M van Poppel; M W van Tulder
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-04-16

Review 3.  European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain.

Authors:  Andry Vleeming; Hanne B Albert; Hans Christian Ostgaard; Bengt Sturesson; Britt Stuge
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain: an update.

Authors:  Nikolaos K Kanakaris; Craig S Roberts; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 8.775

5.  Adherence, tolerance and effectiveness of two different pelvic support belts as a treatment for pregnancy-related symphyseal pain - a pilot randomized trial.

Authors:  Natasha A M S Flack; E Jean C Hay-Smith; Mark D Stringer; Andrew R Gray; Stephanie J Woodley
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Compression shorts reduce prenatal pelvic and low back pain: a prospective quasi-experimental controlled study.

Authors:  Jaclyn M Szkwara; Wayne Hing; Rodney Pope; Evelyne Rathbone
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  The Effect of Maternity Support Garments on Alleviation of Pains and Discomforts during Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carolina Quintero Rodriguez; Olga Troynikov
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2019-08-01

8.  Effectiveness, Feasibility, and Acceptability of Dynamic Elastomeric Fabric Orthoses (DEFO) for Managing Pain, Functional Capacity, and Quality of Life during Prenatal and Postnatal Care: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jaclyn M Szkwara; Nikki Milne; Wayne Hing; Rodney Pope
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-06       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Treatments of pelvic girdle pain in pregnant women: adverse effects of standard treatment, acupuncture and stabilising exercises on the pregnancy, mother, delivery and the fetus/neonate.

Authors:  Helen Elden; Hans-Christian Ostgaard; Monika Fagevik-Olsen; Lars Ladfors; Henrik Hagberg
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 3.659

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.