Literature DB >> 12903226

Comparison of two microenvironments and nurse caregiving on thermal stability of ELBW infants.

Kimberly M Horns1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study tested a novel bioinstrumented radiant warmer (RW), designed to provide a reduced-intervention nursing caregiving environment (RINCE) on the ambient and body surface temperature stability of extremely low birth-weight (ELBW) infants (< 1,000 g) during caregiver disruptions. The RINCE was compared with a control bed consisting of a standard RW, modified with a Plexiglas hood (Rohm and Haas, Philadelphia, PA) and an external humidity source.
SUBJECTS: The sample consisted of 10 extremely low birth-weight infants. The mean gestational age was 25.7 weeks (+/- 1.4 weeks). Birth weight ranged from 570 to 880 g: mean birth weight was 730 g (+/- 95.14 g). The mean Scores for Neonatal Acute Physiology was 21.4 (+/- 6).
DESIGN: This clinical study used a small n sample, crossover time-series design. Infants were randomized to treatment order (control bed v RINCE) on the first day of life. A washout period between microenvironments was observed, and then each infant was placed into the other condition.
METHODS: Each infant was studied for 5 hours in each treatment condition (control bed v RINCE). Abdominal skin temperatures, heel temperatures, ambient temperatures, and relative humidity (RH) were recorded by a computerized data acquisition system every 60 seconds for hours 12 to 24 of life. Caregiver interventions, microenvironment disruptions, or both were manually coded in the data set. PRINCIPAL
RESULTS: The mean number of minutes abdominal temperatures were less than 36.5 degrees C was not significantly different in either microenvironment (P = 0.48). The mean number of minutes that heel temperatures were less than 35.2 degrees C and central-peripheral differences were greater than 2 degrees C was significantly less in the RINCE (P < 0.04 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Although the number and duration of caregiving disruptions (P = 0.71), number of procedures (P = 0.30), and the duration of interventions (P = 0.56) were not significantly different in either environment, the ambient air temperature (P < 0.001) and RH (P < 0.001) were significantly less variable in the RINCE during and after caregiving disruptions.
CONCLUSIONS: This study identified the extreme inter-dependence of the ELBW infant's temperature and the ambient environment. The RINCE significantly improved ambient temperature variability, RH variability, and the infant's peripheral and delta temperature (delta T) stability, particularly during and after caregiver disruptions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12903226     DOI: 10.1053/adnc.2002.33543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Neonatal Care        ISSN: 1536-0903            Impact factor:   1.968


  5 in total

1.  Perfusion Index in Very Low Birth Weight Premature Infants During Their First 2 Weeks of Life.

Authors:  Robin B Knobel-Dail; David T Tanaka; Diane Holditch-Davis; John White
Journal:  Biol Res Nurs       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.522

2.  Optimal body temperature in transitional extremely low birth weight infants using heart rate and temperature as indicators.

Authors:  Robin B Knobel; Diane Holditch-Davis; Todd A Schwartz
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb

3.  The state of the oceans, part 2: Delving deeper into the sea's bounty.

Authors:  John Tibbetts
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Use of a Polyethylene Bag to Reduce Perioperative Regional and Whole-Body Heat Losses in Low-Birth-Weight Neonates.

Authors:  Pierre Tourneux; Estelle Durand; Amandine Pelletier; Laurent Ghyselen; Véronique Bach; Jean-Pierre Libert
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Extremely low birth weight preterm infants lack vasomotor response in relationship to cold body temperatures at birth.

Authors:  R B Knobel; D Holditch-Davis; T A Schwartz; J E Wimmer
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 2.521

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.