Literature DB >> 12902945

Cervical arthroplasty in the management of spondylotic myelopathy.

Lali H S Sekhon1.   

Abstract

Cervical spinal cord compression managed via an anterior approach with an arthrodesis is associated with a decreased range of motion and accelerated adjacent segment degeneration. Artificial cervical disc replacement may address these problems. A series of seven cases (three women, two men; age 31-55 years) of anterior cervical decompression and placement of an artificial disc prosthesis is presented. A total of nine Bryan cervical disc prostheses (Spinal Dynamics Corp., Mercer Island, WA) were placed. Clinical and radiologic follow-up was performed at 24 hours, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and then yearly (mean follow-up period 6.29 months, range 1-17 months). There were no complications. There was an improvement in Nurick grade by 0.72 grade (P < 0.05) and Oswestry Neck Disability Index score by 51.4 points (P < 0.0001). Motion was preserved. Improvement in lordosis occurred in 29% of cases. The spinal cord was decompressed on postoperative imaging. Cervical arthroplasty after anterior cervical decompression at one or more levels represents an exciting tool in the management of spinal cord compression secondary to spondylotic disease or acute disc prolapse. This is the first study that looks specifically at cervical arthroplasty for cervical myelopathy. Longer follow-up will reveal any delayed problems with artificial disc implantation, but in the short term, this technique offers an excellent outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12902945     DOI: 10.1097/00024720-200308000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  13 in total

Review 1.  Cervical spine alignment in disc arthroplasty: should we change our perspective?

Authors:  Alberto Di Martino; Rocco Papalia; Erika Albo; Leonardo Cortesi; Luca Denaro; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Cervical disc prosthesis replacement and interbody fusion: a comparative study.

Authors:  Sun Peng-Fei; Jia Yu-Hua
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  How old is your cervical spine? Cervical spine biological age: a new evaluation scale.

Authors:  Venceslao Wierzbicki; Alessandro Pesce; Luigi Marrocco; Emanuele Piccione; Claudio Colonnese; Riccardo Caruso
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Cervical total disc replacement (TDR).

Authors:  Nils Hansen-Algenstaedt; Salah Khalifah; Melanie Liem; Johannes Holz; Alf Giese
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Adjacent-level degeneration after cervical disc arthroplasty versus fusion.

Authors:  Carlos Valencia Maldonado; Ricardo Díaz-Romero Paz; Claudia Balhen Martin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  [Cervical arthroplasty using the Bryan Cervical Disc System].

Authors:  Friedrich Weber; Michael Detzner
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.154

7.  Artificial discs for lumbar and cervical degenerative disc disease -update: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-04-01

8.  Clinical report of cervical arthroplasty in management of spondylotic myelopathy in Chinese.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Xuesong Zhang; Songhua Xiao; Ning Lu; Zheng Wang; Mi Zhou
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2006-11-04       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Activ C cervical disc replacement for myelopathy.

Authors:  L McGonagle; S Cadman; S D Chitgopkar; L Canavan; M O'Malley; I M Shackleford
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2011-07

10.  Cervical arthroplasty using ProDisc-C case report.

Authors:  D A Nica; R Copaciu
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2013-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.