Literature DB >> 12902903

Expression of Ku80 in cervical cancer correlates with response to radiotherapy and survival.

Yoko Harima1, Satoshi Sawada, Yoshitaka Miyazaki, Kiyonori Kin, Hiroyasu Ishihara, Masahiro Imamura, Mitsuharu Sougawa, Nobuaki Shikata, Takeo Ohnishi.   

Abstract

To reveal the genes relevant for prediction of cervical cancer after radiotherapy, we previously carried out cDNA microarray experiments on primary cervical cancer comparing patients with a complete response (CR) and those with no change (NC). Some of these genes had already been associated with the radiation response, such as x-ray repair cross-complementing 5 (XRCC5), which was found more in radioresistant tumors than in radiosensitive ones. The aim of this study was to confirm the possible roles of XRCC5 mRNA levels by a real-time polymerase chain reaction method in 20 cervical cancers, and Ku80 protein, which is the gene product of XRCC5, using a histopathologic method of formalin-fixed sections of tumor biopsies in determining tumor response to radiotherapy and survival in 89 patients with cervical cancer. The levels of XRCC5 mRNA were 10(4.82) +/- 10(0.2) copies/microg total RNA in tumor tissues in the CR group (mean +/- standard deviation) and 10(4.95) +/- 10(0.32) copies/microg total RNA in those in the NC group. The levels of XRCC5 mRNA were not significantly different between the CR and NC groups. Histopathologic methods revealed 29.2% (26 of 89) of the patients to be Ku80-negative, with Ku80-positive findings in 70.8% (63 of 89). Of the Ku80-negative patients, 19 had CR, 3 had a partial response (PR), and 4 had NC. Of the Ku80-positive patients, 25 had CR, 22 had PR, and 16 had NC. Ku80-negative tumors showed significantly better responses than Ku80-positive ones, comparing CR and PR/NC responses (p = 0.01). In addition, overall survival was significantly better in the Ku80-negative patients as compared with those who were Ku80-positive (p = 0.04). The results of this study suggest that a low expression of Ku80 protein leads to radiosensitivity in cervical cancer and that Ku80 might play a role in treatment outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12902903     DOI: 10.1097/01.COC.0000077938.48974.59

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  16 in total

Review 1.  Genotypic characteristics of resistant tumors to pre-operative ionizing radiation in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Zeeshan Ramzan; Ammar B Nassri; Sergio Huerta
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-07-15

Review 2.  Genetic and epigenetic features in radiation sensitivity Part I: cell signalling in radiation response.

Authors:  Michel H Bourguignon; Pablo A Gisone; Maria R Perez; Severino Michelin; Diana Dubner; Marina Di Giorgio; Edgardo D Carosella
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Prognostic significance of ataxia-telangiectasia mutated, DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit, and Ku heterodimeric regulatory complex 86-kD subunit expression in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jinliang Xing; Xifeng Wu; Ara A Vaporciyan; Margaret R Spitz; Jian Gu
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Microarray analysis of DNA damage repair gene expression profiles in cervical cancer cells radioresistant to 252Cf neutron and X-rays.

Authors:  Yi Qing; Xue-Qin Yang; Zhao-Yang Zhong; Xin Lei; Jia-Yin Xie; Meng-Xia Li; De-Bing Xiang; Zeng-Peng Li; Zhen-Zhou Yang; Ge Wang; Dong Wang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Enhanced cellular radiosensitivity induced by cofilin-1 over-expression is associated with reduced DNA repair capacity.

Authors:  Jyh-Der Leu; Yu-Wen Chiu; Chia-Chien Lo; Pei-Hsun Chiang; Shu-Jun Chiu; Cheng-Han Tsai; Jeng-Jong Hwang; Ran-Chou Chen; Vera Gorbunova; Yi-Jang Lee
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 2.694

6.  Role of DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit in cancer development and treatment.

Authors:  Feng-Ming Hsu; Shichuan Zhang; Benjamin P C Chen
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 1.241

Review 7.  Overview of microarray analysis of gene expression and its applications to cervical cancer investigation.

Authors:  Angel Chao; Tzu-Hao Wang; Chyong-Huey Lai
Journal:  Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.705

8.  Pathway profiling and rational trial design for studies in advanced stage cervical carcinoma: a review and a perspective.

Authors:  Susy M E Scholl; Gemma Kenter; Christian Kurzeder; Philippe Beuzeboc
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2011-07-06

9.  Expression of DNA damage response proteins and complete remission after radiotherapy of stage IB-IIA of cervical cancer.

Authors:  C Beskow; L Kanter; A Holgersson; B Nilsson; B Frankendal; E Avall-Lundqvist; R Lewensohn
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The potential role of Ku80 in primary central nervous system lymphoma as a prognostic factor.

Authors:  Xinwei Li; Xinjia He; Xueying Xu; Zhengfei Song; Chong Qian; Jin Wang; Yirong Wang
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2013-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.