Literature DB >> 12901082

Seasonal variation of total dissolved arsenic and arsenic speciation in a polluted surface waterway.

Andrew G Gault1, David A Polya, Paul R Lythgoe.   

Abstract

Seasonal differences in the dissolved arsenic concentration and speciation in a contaminated urban waterway in northwest England have been determined using a coupled ion chromatography-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (IC-ICP-MS) technique. Waters sampled in the vicinity of an industrial works during relatively dry conditions in April 2000 were found to contain total arsenic concentrations (sigma As) of up to 132 micrograms L-1, more than an order magnitude greater than the 4 micrograms L-1 maximum found in December 2000. The difference in sigma As between the April and December sampling periods is speculated to be largely due to the irregular anthropogenic supply of arsenic to the watercourse. For both sampling periods, the dissolved arsenic was exclusively inorganic in nature and had an As(V)/sigma As ratio of between 0.6 and 0.8. Analysis of samples taken downstream of the industrial site, after the confluence with a relatively As-poor stream, revealed that As(III), As(V) and sigma As concentrations were lower than would be expected from conservative mixing. The As(V)/sigma As ratio was also observed to decrease markedly. The loss of arsenic from solution is thought to be due to adsorption on the iron oxyhydroxide-rich sediment observed to coat the riverbed downstream of the confluence. The reduction in the As(V)/sigma As ratio is believed to be due to the more rapid adsorption of As(V) compared to that of As(III). Deviations from conservative behaviour were more marked during the relatively dry April 2000 sampling period and suggest the increased importance of adsorption processes controlling arsenic availability during this time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12901082     DOI: 10.1023/a:1021253016154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Geochem Health        ISSN: 0269-4042            Impact factor:   4.609


  7 in total

1.  Arsenic species in groundwaters of the blackfoot disease area, taiwan.

Authors:  S L Chen; S R Dzeng; M H Yang; K H Chiu; G M Shieh; C M Wai
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1994-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Interaction of acid mine drainage with waters and sediments of West Squaw Creek in the West Shasta Mining District, California.

Authors:  L H Filipek; D K Nordstrom; W H Ficklin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1987-04-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Arsenic poisoning of Bangladesh groundwater.

Authors:  R Nickson; J McArthur; W Burgess; K M Ahmed; P Ravenscroft; M Rahman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-09-24       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A seasonal study of arsenic in groundwater, Snohomish County, Washington, USA.

Authors:  F Frost; D Franke; K Pierson; L Woodruff; B Raasina; R Davis; J Davies
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.609

5.  Arsenic in groundwater in six districts of West Bengal, India.

Authors:  D Das; G Samanta; B K Mandal; T Roy Chowdhury; C R Chanda; P P Chowdhury; G K Basu; D Chakraborti
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.609

6.  Arsenic-induced skin lesions among Atacameño people in Northern Chile despite good nutrition and centuries of exposure.

Authors:  A H Smith; A P Arroyo; D N Mazumder; M J Kosnett; A L Hernandez; M Beeris; M M Smith; L E Moore
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Cancer risks from arsenic in drinking water.

Authors:  A H Smith; C Hopenhayn-Rich; M N Bates; H M Goeden; I Hertz-Picciotto; H M Duggan; R Wood; M J Kosnett; M T Smith
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.