Literature DB >> 12899901

The moral relevance of personal characteristics in setting health care priorities.

Jan Abel Olsen1, Jeff Richardson, Paul Dolan, Paul Menzel.   

Abstract

This paper discusses the moral relevance of accounting for various personal characteristics when prioritising between groups of patients. After a review of the results from empirical studies, we discuss the ethical reasons which might explain-and justify-the views expressed in these studies. The paper develops a general framework based upon the causes of ill health and the consequences of treatment. It then turns to the question of the extent to which a personal characteristic-and the eventual underlying ethical justification of its relevance-could have any relationships to these causes and consequences. We attempt to disentangle those characteristics that may reflect a potentially relevant justification from those which violate widely accepted principles of social justice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12899901     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00492-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  9 in total

1.  Accountability for an unhealthy lifestyle.

Authors:  Daniel M Campagne
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-04

Review 2.  A systematic review of stated preference studies reporting public preferences for healthcare priority setting.

Authors:  Jennifer A Whitty; Emily Lancsar; Kylie Rixon; Xanthe Golenko; Julie Ratcliffe
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Claims on health care: a decision-making framework for equity, with application to treatment for HIV/AIDS in South Africa.

Authors:  Susan M Cleary; Gavin H Mooney; Diane E McIntyre
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 3.547

4.  'Are smokers less deserving of expensive treatment? A randomised controlled trial that goes beyond official values'.

Authors:  Joar Björk; Niels Lynøe; Niklas Juth
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Who should receive treatment? An empirical enquiry into the relationship between societal views and preferences concerning healthcare priority setting.

Authors:  Vivian Reckers-Droog; Job van Exel; Werner Brouwer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Is the value of a life or life-year saved context specific? Further evidence from a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Duncan Mortimer; Leonie Segal
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2008-05-20

7.  Who Shall Not Be Treated: Public Attitudes on Setting Health Care Priorities by Person-Based Criteria in 28 Nations.

Authors:  Jana Rogge; Bernhard Kittel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Association between alcohol consumption/alcohol use disorders and patient complexity: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Sugiyama; Masato Matsushima; Hisashi Yoshimoto
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Creating an ethical culture to support recovery from substance use disorders.

Authors:  Laura Williamson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.903

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.