Literature DB >> 12899545

Effectiveness of the ROBODOC system in preventing intraoperative pulmonary embolism.

Keisuke Hagio1, Nobuhiko Sugano, Masaki Takashina, Takashi Nishii, Hideki Yoshikawa, Takahiro Ochi.   

Abstract

Intraoperative pulmonary embolism occurs not only during cemented but also during cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). We determined whether the ROBODOC femoral milling system can reduce intraoperative pulmonary embolism, by using of transesophageal echocardiography and hemodynamic monitoring. We did a prospective clinical trial with 71 patients (75 hips) who were divided into 2 groups: group 1, 46 patients (50 hips) who underwent cementless THA with preparation of the femoral canal using ROBODOC; group 2, 25 patients (25 hips) who underwent conventional cementless THA surgery in whom separate measurements were made during preparation of the femur, insertion of the stem and relocation of the hip. The incidence of severe embolic events was lower in group 1 than in group 2. Our findings suggest that the ROBODOC femoral milling system may reduce the risk of clinically significant pulmonary embolism during cementless THA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12899545     DOI: 10.1080/00016470310014175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  9 in total

1.  A comparison between robotic-assisted and manual implantation of cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nobuo Nakamura; Nobuhiko Sugano; Takashi Nishii; Akihiro Kakimoto; Hidenobu Miki
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Does Robotic Milling For Stem Implantation in Cementless THA Result in Improved Outcomes Scores or Survivorship Compared with Hand Rasping? Results of a Randomized Trial at 10 Years.

Authors:  Nobuo Nakamura; Nobuhiko Sugano; Takashi Sakai; Ichiro Nakahara
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Robotics in trauma and orthopaedics.

Authors:  Karthik Karuppiah; Joydeep Sinha
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Computer-assisted hip and knee arthroplasty. Navigation and active robotic systems: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2004-02-01

Review 5.  Risk factors for venous thromboembolism of total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of evidences in ten years.

Authors:  Zi-hao Zhang; Bin Shen; Jing Yang; Zong-ke Zhou; Peng-de Kang; Fu-xing Pei
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Evidence for robots.

Authors:  Ravikiran Shenoy; Dinesh Nathwani
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2017-05-25

7.  The Evolution of Computer-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty and Relevant Applications.

Authors:  Jun-Dong Chang; In-Sung Kim; Atul M Bhardwaj; Ramachandra N Badami
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2017-03-06

8.  Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty vs Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Nationwide Database Study.

Authors:  Sione A Ofa; Bailey J Ross; Travis R Flick; Akshar H Patel; William F Sherman
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-11-07

Review 9.  Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery and robotic surgery in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-02-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.