Literature DB >> 12899110

Use of the New Zealand Intensive Medicines Monitoring Programme to study the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (Mirena).

Lifeng Zhou1, Mira Harrison-Woolrych, David M Coulter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To demonstrate how the Intensive Medicines Monitoring Programme (IMMP) can be used to monitor adverse events associated with an intrauterine device, using the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (Mirena) as an example.
METHODS: A long-term prospective observational cohort study using Prescription Event Monitoring (PEM) is currently being undertaken in women using Mirena in New Zealand. This report describes the method used and reports the early results for those women who used the device between March 1998 and March 2001. Adverse events were recorded by inserting doctors and general practitioners on registration forms and systematic follow-up questionnaires.
RESULTS: Between March 1998 and March 2001, the IMMP received 3519 registration forms for insertions in 3452 women. 'Difficult insertion' was the most frequently reported event (3.6% of all insertions). Approximately, 2% of the Mirena insertions were carried out under GA and there were three uterine perforations (0.9 per 1000 insertions) in the total cohort. To date, follow-up questionnaires have been processed for 495 patients. The response rate for these was 83%.
CONCLUSION: As adapted in the IMMP, PEM is an effective tool for the early post-marketing surveillance of an intrauterine device in real life clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12899110     DOI: 10.1002/pds.875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  7 in total

1.  Uterine perforation with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device: analysis of reports from four national pharmacovigilance centres.

Authors:  Kees van Grootheest; Bernhardt Sachs; Mira Harrison-Woolrych; Pia Caduff-Janosa; Eugène van Puijenbroek
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Practical advice for avoidance of pain associated with insertion of intrauterine contraceptives.

Authors:  Luis Bahamondes; Diana Mansour; Christian Fiala; Andrew M Kaunitz; Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson
Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care       Date:  2013-09-27

3.  A levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system embedded in the omentum in a woman with abdominal pain: a case report.

Authors:  Asimakis Pappas; Siddesh Shambhu; Kevin Phillips; Kate Guthrie
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2009-11-27

Review 4.  Implantable Devices for Sustained, Intravesical Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Seung Ho Lee; Young Bin Choy
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 5.  A review of barriers and myths preventing the more widespread use of intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women.

Authors:  Kirsten Black; Pamela Lotke; Kai J Buhling; Nikki B Zite
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 6.  Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives.

Authors:  Sam Rowlands; Emeka Oloto; David H Horwell
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2016-03-16

7.  Clinical characteristic and intraoperative findings of uterine perforation patients in using of intrauterine devices (IUDs).

Authors:  Xin Sun; Min Xue; Xinliang Deng; Yun Lin; Ying Tan; Xueli Wei
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2018-01-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.