Literature DB >> 12898166

Freeze or dehydrate: only two options for the survival of subzero temperatures in the arctic enchytraeid Fridericia ratzeli.

P G Pedersen1, M Holmstrup.   

Abstract

Hygrophilic soil animals, like enchytraeids, overwintering in frozen soil are unlikely to base their cold tolerance on supercooling of body fluids. It seems more likely that they will either freeze due to inoculative freezing, or dehydrate and adjust their body fluid melting point to ambient temperature as has been shown for earthworm cocoons and Collembola. In the present study we tested this hypothesis by exposing field-collected adult Fridericia ratzeli from Disko, West Greenland, to freezing temperatures under various moisture regimes. When cooled at -1 degrees C min(-1) under dry conditions F. ratzeli had a mean temperature of crystallisation ( T(c)) of -5.8 degrees C. However, when exposed to temperatures above standard T(c) for 22 h, at -4 degrees C, most individuals (90%, n= 30) remained unfrozen. Slow cooling from -1 degrees C to -6 degrees C in vials where the air was in equilibrium with the vapour pressure of ice resulted in freezing in about 65% of the individuals. These individuals maintained a normal body water content of 2.7-3.0 mg mg(-1) dry weight and had body fluid melting points of about -0.5 degrees C with little or no change due to freezing. About 35% of the individuals dehydrated drastically to below 1.1 mg mg(-1) dry weight at -6 degrees C, and consequently had lowered their body fluid melting point to ca. -6 degrees C at this time. Survival was high in both frozen and dehydrated animals at -6 degrees C, about 60%. Approximately 25% of the animals (both frozen and dehydrated individuals) had elevated glucose concentrations, but the mean glucose concentration was not increased to any great extent in any group due to cold exposure. The desiccating potential of ice was simulated using aqueous NaCl solutions at 0 degrees C. Water loss and survival in this experiment were in good agreement with results from freezing experiments. The influence of soil moisture on survival and tendency to dehydrate was also evaluated. However, soil moisture ranging between 0.74 g g(-1) and 1.15 g g(-1) dry soil did not result in any significant differences in survival or frequency of dehydrated animals even though the apparent wetness and structure of the soil was clearly different in these moisture contents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12898166     DOI: 10.1007/s00360-003-0370-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol B        ISSN: 0174-1578            Impact factor:   2.200


  10 in total

Review 1.  Aspects of natural cold tolerance in ectothermic animals.

Authors:  H Ramløv
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Freeze induced glucose accumulation in the enchytraeid, Fredericia ratzeli from Greenland.

Authors:  M Holmstrup; H Sjursen
Journal:  Cryo Letters       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  Supercool or dehydrate? An experimental analysis of overwintering strategies in small permeable arctic invertebrates.

Authors:  Martin Holmstrup; Mark Bayley; Hans Ramløv
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  DSC studies of freezing in terrestrial enchytraeids (Annelida: oligochaeta).

Authors:  W Block; R Bauer
Journal:  Cryo Letters       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 5.  Anhydrobiosis.

Authors:  J H Crowe; F A Hoekstra; L M Crowe
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 19.318

6.  Freezing survival and cryoprotective dehydration as cold tolerance mechanisms in the Antarctic nematode Panagrolaimus davidi.

Authors:  David A Wharton; Gordon Goodall; Craig J Marshall
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 7.  Organic solutes in freezing tolerance.

Authors:  K B Storey
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Physiol       Date:  1997-07

Review 8.  Physiology of cold tolerance in insects.

Authors:  K E Zachariassen
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 37.312

9.  Inoculative freezing by environmental ice nuclei in the freeze-tolerant wood frog, Rana sylvatica.

Authors:  J P Costanzo; J M Bayuk; R E Lee
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1999-06-15

10.  Geographic variation of freeze-tolerance in the earthworm Dendrobaena octaedra.

Authors:  L M Rasmussen; M Holmstrup
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2002-09-20       Impact factor: 2.200

  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  The oatmeal nematode Panagrellus redivivus survives moderately low temperatures by freezing tolerance and cryoprotective dehydration.

Authors:  Masakazu Hayashi; David A Wharton
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Three strategies of cold tolerance in click beetles (Coleoptera, Elateridae).

Authors:  D I Berman; A N Leirikh; E P Bessolitzina
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-03

3.  Responses to acute and chronic desiccation stress in Enchytraeus (Oligochaeta: Enchytraeidae).

Authors:  Kristine Maraldo; Helle Weber Ravn; Stine Slotsbo; Martin Holmstrup
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 2.200

4.  Population-specific transcriptional differences associated with freeze tolerance in a terrestrial worm.

Authors:  Tjalf E de Boer; Dick Roelofs; Riet Vooijs; Martin Holmstrup; Mónica J B Amorim
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-03-11       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Surviving the cold: molecular analyses of insect cryoprotective dehydration in the Arctic springtail Megaphorura arctica (Tullberg).

Authors:  Melody S Clark; Michael As Thorne; Jelena Purać; Gavin Burns; Guy Hillyard; Zeljko D Popović; Gordana Grubor-Lajsić; M Roger Worland
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Antifreeze protein complements cryoprotective dehydration in the freeze-avoiding springtail Megaphorura arctica.

Authors:  Laurie A Graham; Marie E Boddington; Martin Holmstrup; Peter L Davies
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.