Literature DB >> 12898048

[Vertical infraclavicular blockade of the brachial plexus (VIP). A modified method to verify the puncture point under consideration of the risk of pneumothorax].

M Neuburger1, H Kaiser, B Ass, C Franke, H Maurer.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The vertical infraclavicular blockade of the brachial plexus (VIP) according to Kilka et al.is a technique which has gained more importance over the past years. This method distinguishes itself from other periclavicular techniques by a very low risk of pneumothorax (0.2%), which seems to be increased with asthenic patients.
METHODS: In the study presented we examined 52 patients undergoing a vertical infraclavicular blockade of the brachial plexus, for an alternative method to determine the puncture point. With 31 of the 52 patients, who had a small distance (<20 cm) between the landmarks jugulum and anterior process of the acromion, the puncture point was moved 0.3 cm in a lateral direction for each centimeter less than 20 cm. Additionally we determined the "finger-point", i.e. the medial margin of the anesthetist's index finger, placed in the gap between the M. deltoideus and M. pectoralis with the finger tip touching the clavicle.
RESULTS: In 54% of the patients, the "finger-point" corresponded to the measured puncture point. In 46% of the patients, these points varied by a maximum of 1 cm in the lateral or medial direction. In 53% of the patients, the plexus could be found at the measured puncture point,which applied especially to the patients with a small distance between the leading points (<20 cm) and as a consequence a lateralized puncture point. If a correction of the puncture point was necessary to find the plexus, the correction by skin movement would always be in the direction of the "finger-point".
CONCLUSIONS: As a consequence, we assume that if the distance between the leading points jugulum and ventral process of acromion is smaller than 20 cm, the puncture point for a vertical infraclavicular blockade of the brachial plexus should be lateralized as described above; additionally, the "finger-point" should be determined in order to verify the puncture point and to finally give an idea of the direction, in case of a possible need for correcting the puncture point.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12898048     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-003-0526-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Anesthesia in the brachial plexus].

Authors:  V Hempel
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [Pneumothorax in vertical infraclavicular block of the brachial plexus. Review of a rare complication].

Authors:  M Neuburger; H Landes; H Kaiser
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  [Biometric data on risk of pneumothorax from vertical infraclavicular brachial plexus block. A magnetic resonance imaging study].

Authors:  M Neuburger; H Kaiser; M Uhl
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Ultrasonographic assessment of topographic anatomy in volunteers suggests a modification of the infraclavicular vertical brachial plexus block.

Authors:  M Greher; G Retzl; P Niel; L Kamolz; P Marhofer; S Kapral
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  [Vertical infraclavicular brachial-plexus blockade. A clinical study of reliability of a new method for plexus anesthesia of the upper extremity].

Authors:  M Neuburger; H Kaiser; I Rembold-Schuster; H Landes
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Infraclavicular vertical plexus blockade: a safe alternative to the axillary approach?

Authors:  G K Schüpfer; M Jöhr
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  [Infraclavicular vertical brachial plexus blockade. A new method for anesthesia of the upper extremity. An anatomical and clinical study].

Authors:  H G Kilka; P Geiger; H H Mehrkens
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.041

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  [Neurological complication after a vertical infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Case report of possible differential diagnoses of a neurological deficit].

Authors:  R Ehrenberg; M Bucher; B Graf
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Comparison of the vertical and the highest point of shoulder methods in brachial plexus block.

Authors:  Kiritoglu S; Basaranoglu G; Comlekci M; Suren M; Erkalp K; Teker G; Saidoglu L
Journal:  Int J Biomed Sci       Date:  2009-03

3.  Modified vertical infraclavicular block: An evaluation of two methods.

Authors:  Olumuyiwa A Bamgbade
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.