Literature DB >> 12898037

[Vasectomy today: a review of 1,275 vasectomies in 10 years].

F Dahm1, P Dahm, J Dahm.   

Abstract

We report on a large series of 1,275 patients who underwent outpatient vasectomy performed by a single urological surgeon within a 10-year period. In addition, the results of a prospective questionnaire-based study on 217 patients regarding their opinions and motivation, and the financial aspects of the vasectomy are discussed. The mean age was 37.0+/-5.9 years. A total of 98.4% of the patients had an uneventful postoperative course. The average duration of sick leave was 2.2+/-0.21 days. During the study period, the length of sick leave dropped significantly from 2.63 (1990/91) to 1.1 days (1998/99; P=0.001). Efficacy was documented with azoospermia rates of 96.6% and 98.5% in patients who presented for two and three sperm examinations, respectively. A vast majority of patients (94.6%) felt that the procedure should be covered by their health insurance, although 88.1% stated they would also pay by themselves. A minority of patients (0.7%: 9/1,275) subsequently considered vasectomy reversal. The wish to reverse the vasectomy was significantly associated with a younger patient age. In conclusion, outpatient vasectomy provides a safe and reliable form of contraception at low cost. Overall satisfaction in appropriately counselled patients is very high. Based on these findings, further attempts to propagate vasectomy as a timely form of contraception are medically and socioeconomically recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12898037     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-003-0301-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  10 in total

Review 1.  Vasectomy: common medicolegal pitfalls.

Authors:  J M Preston
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  How reliable is a vasectomy? Long-term follow-up of vasectomised men.

Authors:  N Haldar; D Cranston; E Turner; I MacKenzie; J Guillebaud
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The lurking sperm. A review of failures in 8879 vasectomies performed by one physician.

Authors:  P M Alderman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Minimally invasive vasectomy.

Authors:  B A Holt; A F Higgins
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1996-04

5.  [Vasectomy and partnership status--an empirical study of 156 males (couples)].

Authors:  P Goebel; K Ortmann; T Blattner
Journal:  Z Psychosom Med Psychoanal       Date:  1987

6.  Vasectomy and vasectomy reversal.

Authors:  M Goldstein
Journal:  Curr Ther Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1994

7.  [Experiences with vasectomy. Catamnestic study over a 10-year period].

Authors:  C Schirren
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Semen analysis after vasectomy: when and how many?

Authors:  C Badrakumar; N K Gogoi; S K Sundaram
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 9.  Vasectomy.

Authors:  W H Weiske
Journal:  Andrologia       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.775

10.  [Risk factors in vasectomy--a comparison of satisfied vasectomized males with dissatisfied males seeking refertilization].

Authors:  P Goebel; K Ortmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 0.639

  10 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Ischemic testicular necrosis following vasectomy: rare and typical complications of an outpatient procedure].

Authors:  N Rolfes; G Lümmen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Demographics of men receiving vasectomies in Poland 2019-2020.

Authors:  Emilia Pawłowska-Krajka; Mateusz Bajkowski; Adam Dorobek; Bartosz Hnatowski; Piotr Radziszewski
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2022-05-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.