Literature DB >> 12897593

Methodologic issues in randomized controlled trials of surgical interventions.

P J Devereaux1, Michael D McKee, Salim Yusuf.   

Abstract

A physician's ability to make conclusions about the relative efficacy of interventions based on their clinical experience is limited frequently. Therefore, surgeons commonly use research evidence to guide their clinical practice. The randomized controlled trial is the strongest study design. However, randomization in itself does not guarantee the trial results are valid (free from bias). Understanding the potential impact of various methodologic features of a randomized controlled trial allows a clinician to determine the validity of a trial. We present a guide for evaluating the validity of randomized controlled trials giving special consideration to issues confronted in surgical trials.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12897593     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000080539.81794.54

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  7 in total

Review 1.  The reporting of randomized clinical trials using a surgical intervention is in need of immediate improvement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Isabelle Jacquier; Isabelle Boutron; David Moher; Carine Roy; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  The relation between antihypertensive treatment and progression of cerebral small vessel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Chen Su; Hao Wu; Xiaoyu Yang; Bing Zhao; Renliang Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Trials and tribulations: the professional development of surgical trialists.

Authors:  Anna F Jarman; Nelda P Wray; Danielle M Wenner; Carol M Ashton
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  The beneficial effect of hydroxyapatite lasts: a randomized radiostereometric trial comparing hydroxyapatite-coated, uncoated, and cemented tibial components for up to 16 years.

Authors:  Bart G Pijls; Edward R Valstar; Bart L Kaptein; Marta Fiocco; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 5.  Reporting methods of blinding in randomized trials assessing nonpharmacological treatments.

Authors:  Isabelle Boutron; Lydia Guittet; Candice Estellat; David Moher; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Safety and efficacy of botox injection in alleviating post-operative pain and improving quality of life in lower extremity limb lengthening and deformity correction.

Authors:  Reggie C Hamdy; Kathleen Montpetit; Joanne Ruck-Gibis; Kelly Thorstad; Ellen Raney; Michael Aiona; Robert Platt; Allen Finley; William Mackenzie; James McCarthy; Unni Narayanan
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 7.  Long-term effects of cemented and cementless fixations of total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Cheng Chen; Yanyan Shi; Zhanpo Wu; Zengxin Gao; Youmin Chen; Changzheng Guo; Xianguo Bao
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 2.359

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.