Literature DB >> 12897315

Vancomycin use in hospitalized pediatric patients.

Harry L Keyserling1, Ronda L Sinkowitz-Cochran, James M Harris, Gail L Levine, Jane D Siegel, Beth H Stover, Sharon A Lau, William R Jarvis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess vancomycin utilization at children's hospitals, to determine risk factors for vancomycin use and length of therapy, and to facilitate adapting recommendations to optimize vancomycin prescribing practices in pediatric patients.
METHODS: Two surveys were conducted at Pediatric Prevention Network hospitals. The first (Survey I) evaluated vancomycin control programs. The second (Survey II) prospectively reviewed individual patient records. Each hospital was asked to complete questionnaires on 25 consecutive patients or all patients for whom vancomycin was prescribed during a 1-month period.
RESULTS: In Survey I, 55 of 65 (85%) hospitals reported their vancomycin control policies. Three quarters had specific policies in place to restrict vancomycin use. One half had at least 3 vancomycin restriction measures. In Survey II, personnel at 22 hospitals reviewed 416 vancomycin courses, with 2 to 25 (median = 12) patients tracked per hospital. Eighty-two percent of the vancomycin prescribed was for treatment of neonatal sepsis, fever/neutropenia, fever of unknown origin, positive blood culture, pneumonia, or meningitis. In an additional 6% (26/416), vancomycin was prescribed for patients with beta-lactam allergies and in 13% (56/416) for prophylaxis. Median duration of prophylaxis was 2 days (range: 1-15 days). Almost half (196, 47%) of the patients who received vancomycin were in intensive care units; 27% of the vancomycin courses were initiated by neonatologists and 19% by hematologists/oncologists. The predominant risk factor at the time of vancomycin initiation was the presence of vascular catheters (322, 77%); other host factors included cancer chemotherapy (55, 13%), transplant (30, 7%), shock (24, 6%), other immunosuppressant therapy (17, 4%), or hyposplenic state (2, <1%). Other clinical considerations were severity of illness (96, 23%), uncertainty about diagnosis (51, 12%), patient not responding to current antibiotic therapy (40, 10%), or implant infection (13, 3%). When vancomycin was initiated, blood cultures were positive in 85 patients (20%); cultures from other sites were positive in 45 (11%), and Gram stains of body fluids were positive in 37 (9%). In 29 (7%) patients, organisms sensitive only to vancomycin were isolated before vancomycin initiation. Reasons for discontinuing vancomycin included: therapeutic course completed (125, 30%), negative cultures (106, 25%), alternative antibiotics initiated (75, 18%), illness resolved (14, 3%), or patient expired (13, 3%). Final results of blood culture isolates resistant to beta-lactam antibiotics included 48 coagulase-negative staphylococcus, 5 Staphylococcus aureus, and 10 other species.
CONCLUSIONS: At children's hospitals, vancomycin is initiated for therapy in patients who have vascular catheters and compromised host factors. Only 7% had laboratory-confirmed beta-lactam-resistant organisms isolated at the time vancomycin was prescribed. Efforts to modify empiric vancomycin use in children's hospitals should be targeted at intensivists, neonatologists, and hematologists. Initiatives to decrease length of therapy by decreasing the number of surgical prophylaxis doses and days of therapy before laboratory results may decrease vancomycin exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12897315     DOI: 10.1542/peds.112.2.e104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  7 in total

Review 1.  Drug utilization review across jurisdictions--a reality or still a distant dream?

Authors:  Lisa K Pulver; Susan E Tett
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Correlation of vancomycin dosing to serum concentrations in pediatric patients: a retrospective database review.

Authors:  Kim W Benner; Mary A Worthington; David W Kimberlin; Kim Hill; Kevin Buckley; Nancy M Tofil
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2009-04

3.  Rapid differentiation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus from blood cultures by use of a direct cefoxitin disk diffusion test.

Authors:  Kelly Bennett; Susan E Sharp
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Prescribing habits and caregiver satisfaction with resources for dosing children: rationale for more informative dosing guidance.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Barrett; Mahesh Narayan; Dimple Patel; Athena F Zuppa; Peter C Adamson
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 2.125

5.  Steady-state Pharmacokinetics of Vancomycin in Children Admitted to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Referral Center.

Authors:  Nitin B Mali; Milind S Tullu; Poorwa P Wandalkar; Siddharth P Deshpande; Vinod C Ingale; Chandrahas T Deshmukh; Nithya J Gogtay; Urmila M Thatte
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-11

6.  Comparison of teicoplanin disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis.

Authors:  Carlos Henrique Camargo; Alessandro Lia Mondelli; Paulo José Fortes Villas Bôas
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 2.476

7.  Pediatric vancomycin use in 421 hospitals in the United States, 2008.

Authors:  Tamar Lasky; Jay Greenspan; Frank R Ernst; Liliana Gonzalez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.