Literature DB >> 12897278

Learning, cognitive, and attentional problems in adolescents born small for gestational age.

Michael J O'Keeffe1, Michael O'Callaghan, Gail M Williams, Jake M Najman, William Bor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the presence, severity, or symmetry of growth restriction in term infants is an independent risk factor for learning, cognitive, and attentional problems in adolescence.
METHODS: A total of 7388 term infants have been followed prospectively since birth. At 14 years, 5059 mothers completed a Child Behavior Checklist and provided information on their child's school progress. A total of 5051 adolescents completed a Youth Self Report, with 3703 also undergoing psychometric testing with Ravens Progressive Matrices and Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT) reading subtest. Outcomes were compared on the basis of birth weight groups and measures of body symmetry and were adjusted for the level of social risk at birth.
RESULTS: Adolescents who were born small for gestational age (SGA), when compared with their appropriately grown counterparts (>10th percentile), were more likely to experience learning difficulties, with a higher prevalence in those of birth weight < or =3rd percentile. Girls of birth weight < or =3rd percentile were more likely to have attentional problems and low WRAT reading scores. There was no significant difference in Ravens IQ or mean WRAT reading scores between SGA and non-SGA groups. There was no association between body symmetry and any of the outcomes studied.
CONCLUSIONS: SGA status seems to have only modest independent effects on learning, cognition, and attention in adolescence. Severity but not symmetry of growth restriction predicted learning difficulties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12897278     DOI: 10.1542/peds.112.2.301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  40 in total

1.  WIDE RANGE ACHIEVEMENT TEST IN AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER: TEST-RETEST STABILITY.

Authors:  Paul B Jantz; Erin D Bigler; Alyson L Froehlich; Molly B D Prigge; Annahir N Cariello; Brittany G Travers; Jeffrey Anderson; Brandon A Zielinski; Andrew L Alexander; Nicholas Lange; Janet E Lainhart
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2015-04-14

2.  Gestational age, birth weight, and the risk of hyperkinetic disorder.

Authors:  K M Linnet; K Wisborg; E Agerbo; N J Secher; P H Thomsen; T B Henriksen
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Long-term deficits of preterm birth: evidence for arousal and attentional disturbances.

Authors:  R Whit Hall; Tiffany Wallace Huitt; Richa Thapa; D Keith Williams; K J S Anand; Edgar Garcia-Rill
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Gestational Weight Gain and Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Underweight Pregnant Women: A Population-Based Historical Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Gavard
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-05

5.  The association of gestational weight gain with birth weight in obese pregnant women by obesity class and diabetic status: a population-based historical cohort study.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Gavard; Raul Artal
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-05

6.  Infant birth outcomes among substance using women: why quitting smoking during pregnancy is just as important as quitting illicit drug use.

Authors:  Beth A Bailey; Judy G McCook; Alexis Hodge; Lana McGrady
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-02

7.  Physiological regulation in cigarette exposed infants: an examination of potential moderators.

Authors:  Pamela Schuetze; Rina D Eiden; Craig R Colder; Theresa R Gray; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 3.763

8.  Partner violence during pregnancy: prevalence, effects, screening, and management.

Authors:  Beth A Bailey
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

Review 9.  Should recombinant human growth hormone therapy be used in short small for gestational age children?

Authors:  L B Johnston; M O Savage
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  The effect of plurality and gestation on the prevention or postponement of infant mortality: 1989-1991 versus 1999-2001.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.587

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.