Literature DB >> 1289512

Effects of antihypertensive agents on carotid pulse contour in humans.

A P Guerin1, B M Pannier, S J Marchais, F Metivier, M Safar, G M London.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the influence of antihypertensive agents on arterial wave reflections (AWR) and carotid pulse pressure (PP) in humans. Twenty patients with hypertension (predominantly systolic) were studied. After one month of placebo therapy they were randomly assigned to atenolol (At) 50 mg/day or to nitrendipine (Ni) 40 mg/day. Carotid pressure waveform was recorded noninvasively by applanation tonometry using a Millar micromanometer-tipped probe. Arterial wave reflections were quantified as the ratio of the height of the late systolic peak (delta P) to the total height of carotid pulse pressure wave as an augmentation index (delta P/PP). Travel time of the reflected wave (delta tp) was timed from the foot of the pressure wave to the foot of the late systolic peak. Atenolol and Ni were equally effective in reducing sphygmomanometric brachial artery blood pressure (BP). Whereas At (p < 0.05) and Ni (p < 0.01) reduced the carotid PP, Ni (p < 0.01) but not At significantly reduced delta P/PP. Both agents increased the delta tp (p < 0.01) and decreased aortic PWV (p < 0.01). Nitrendipine was associated with a decrease in left ventricular ejection time (LVET) (p < 0.01), while At increased heart period (p < 0.01) and LVET. The LVET/delta tp ratio decreased after Ni (from 3.25 +/- 0.77 to 2.42 +/- 0.73; p < 0.01) but did not change after At. The study shows, that for the same effect on peripheral BP, Ni has a more pronounced effect on pressure wave in central arteries, resulting from an improvement in the timing between the ventricular ejection and AWRs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1289512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  4 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis of the comparative effects of different classes of antihypertensive agents on brachial and central systolic blood pressure, and augmentation index.

Authors:  Charlotte H Manisty; Alun D Hughes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Impact of Antihypertensive Agents on Central Systolic Blood Pressure and Augmentation Index: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tracey J McGaughey; Emily A Fletcher; Sachin A Shah
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 3.  Arterial compliance and blood pressure.

Authors:  S J Marchais; A P Guerin; B Pannier; G Delavaud; G M London
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Central blood pressure for the management of hypertension: Is it a practical clinical tool in current practice?

Authors:  Hao-Min Cheng; Shao-Yuan Chuang; Tzung-Dau Wang; Kazuomi Kario; Peera Buranakitjaroen; Yook-Chin Chia; Romeo Divinagracia; Satoshi Hoshide; Huynh Van Minh; Jennifer Nailes; Sungha Park; Jinho Shin; Saulat Siddique; Jorge Sison; Arieska Ann Soenarta; Guru Prasad Sogunuru; Apichard Sukonthasarn; Jam Chin Tay; Boon Wee Teo; Yuda Turana; Narsingh Verma; Yuqing Zhang; Ji-Guang Wang; Chen-Huan Chen
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.