Literature DB >> 12893864

Mammographic screening: give us the facts.

Hazel Thornton1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2003        PMID： 12893864      PMCID： PMC539577          DOI： 10.1177/014107680309600816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN： 0141-0768            Impact factor:   18.000


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Insurance repercussions of mammographic screening: what do women think?

Authors:  Claire Davey; Victoria White; Jeanette E Ward
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2002-12

Review 2.  Validation of screening procedures.

Authors:  A L Cochrane; W W Holland
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 4.291

3.  Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  O Olsen; P C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-10-20       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Outcomes of screening to prevent cancer: analysis of cumulative incidence of cervical abnormality and modelling of cases and deaths prevented.

Authors:  A E Raffle; B Alden; M Quinn; P J Babb; M T Brett
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-26

5.  A comparison of risk perception and psychological morbidity in women with ductal carcinoma in situ and early invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Eileen Rakovitch; Edmee Franssen; John Kim; Ida Ackerman; Jean-Philippe Pignol; Lawrence Paszat; Kathleen I Pritchard; Cindy Ho; Donald A Redelmeier
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Perceptions of breast cancer risk and screening effectiveness in women younger than 50 years of age.

Authors:  W C Black; R F Nease; A N Tosteson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-05-17       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Breast cancer and the pill.

Authors:  A A Kubba
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 18.000
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.