Nadja Maric1, Lydia Krabbendam, Wilma Vollebergh, Ron de Graaf, Jim van Os. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, azM/Mondriaan/Riagg/RIBW/Vijverdal Academic Centre, European Graduate School of Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616 (DRT 10), 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about sex differences in psychosis beyond the borders of clinical disorder. METHODS: A general population sample of 7,076 subjects was assessed using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, in order to explore sex differences in the prevalence of any positive and negative symptoms of psychosis, and to examine to what degree any differences could be explained by differences in level of affective symptoms. RESULTS: Male sex was associated with higher prevalence of negative symptoms (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.0, 2.5), independent of differences in affective symptoms and presence of DSM-III-R psychotic disorder. Women had higher rates of positive psychotic experiences (OR = 0.8, 95% CI = 0.7, 0.9), but this difference disappeared after adjustment for depressive symptoms (adjusted OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 0.9, 1.5). CONCLUSION: The sex differences in psychopathology that are seen in schizophrenia are expressed beyond the clinical phenotype, suggesting sex-dependent continuous and normal variation of several psychosis dimensions. The higher rates of positive psychotic experiences seen in women may be secondary to differences in the rate of affective symptoms.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about sex differences in psychosis beyond the borders of clinical disorder. METHODS: A general population sample of 7,076 subjects was assessed using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, in order to explore sex differences in the prevalence of any positive and negative symptoms of psychosis, and to examine to what degree any differences could be explained by differences in level of affective symptoms. RESULTS: Male sex was associated with higher prevalence of negative symptoms (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.0, 2.5), independent of differences in affective symptoms and presence of DSM-III-R psychotic disorder. Women had higher rates of positive psychotic experiences (OR = 0.8, 95% CI = 0.7, 0.9), but this difference disappeared after adjustment for depressive symptoms (adjusted OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 0.9, 1.5). CONCLUSION: The sex differences in psychopathology that are seen in schizophrenia are expressed beyond the clinical phenotype, suggesting sex-dependent continuous and normal variation of several psychosis dimensions. The higher rates of positive psychotic experiences seen in women may be secondary to differences in the rate of affective symptoms.
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Howard Birnbaum; Olga Demler; Ian R H Falloon; Elizabeth Gagnon; Margaret Guyer; Mary J Howes; Kenneth S Kendler; Lizheng Shi; Ellen Walters; Eric Q Wu Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2005-07-14 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero; Javier Ortuño; Martin Debbané; Raymond C K Chan; David Cicero; Lisa C Zhang; Colleen Brenner; Emma Barkus; Richard J Linscott; Thomas Kwapil; Neus Barrantes-Vidal; Alex Cohen; Adrian Raine; Michael T Compton; Erin B Tone; Julie Suhr; Felix Inchausti; Julio Bobes; Axit Fumero; Stella Giakoumaki; Ioannis Tsaousis; Antonio Preti; Michael Chmielewski; Julien Laloyaux; Anwar Mechri; Mohamed Aymen Lahmar; Viviana Wuthrich; Frank Larøi; Johanna C Badcock; Assen Jablensky; Adela M Isvoranu; Sacha Epskamp; Eiko I Fried Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2018-10-15 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: N Maric; I Myin-Germeys; P Delespaul; R de Graaf; W Vollebergh; J Van Os Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Johanna T W Wigman; Wilma A M Vollebergh; Quinten A W Raaijmakers; Jurjen Iedema; Saskia van Dorsselaer; Johan Ormel; Frank C Verhulst; Jim van Os Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2009-12-31 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Leon Fonville; Kathrin Cohen Kadosh; Mark Drakesmith; Anirban Dutt; Stanley Zammit; Josephine Mollon; Abraham Reichenberg; Glyn Lewis; Derek K Jones; Anthony S David Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 5.357